Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in education, offering scalable individualized learning. However, there is a lack of theoretically informed and methodologically rigorous research on how GenAI can effectively augment learning. This manuscript addresses this gap by investigating the potential of a theory-informed GenAI chatbot, ChatTutor—designed for students—to facilitate generative sense-making by leveraging principles from generative learning theory. The study aimed to (1) extend theory by proposing how GenAI can support generative sense-making and (2) test its effects on conceptual knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust post-use and on conceptual knowledge, enjoyment, and behavioral intentions in a delayed follow-up. We conducted two between-subjects design experiments. Study 1 was a pre-registered experiment with 175 university students in an authentic cognitive psychology course, comparing ChatTutor with a generic GenAI system (ChatGPT) and a teaching-as-usual control. Study 2 replicated the design with 234 high school students, comparing ChatTutor to ChatGPT, and a re-study control. Results showed that ChatTutor significantly enhanced trust and enjoyment in both studies, and behavioral intentions in Study 1, compared to ChatGPT. It also improved conceptual knowledge over ChatGPT immediately in both studies and at follow-up in Study 2. ChatTutor outperformed the control condition in conceptual knowledge, although this difference was only significant in the follow-up of Study 1 and the immediate test of Study 2. Differences in self-efficacy were not significant. The research underscores the importance of integrating human-centered design and educational psychology theories into GenAI applications and offers directions for future research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10039-x
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making

Steven P. Blurton, Tue Herlau, Guido Makransky
5 citations
Educational Psychology Review
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
10.59
article

Beyond the “Wow” Factor: Using Generative AI for Increasing Generative Sense-Making

Steven P. Blurton, Tue Herlau, Guido Makransky
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a transformative tool in education, offering scalable individualized learning. However, there is a lack of theoretically informed and methodologically rigorous research on how GenAI can effectively augment learning. This manuscript addresses this gap by investigating the potential of a theory-informed GenAI chatbot, ChatTutor—designed for students—to facilitate generative sense-making by leveraging principles from generative learning theory. The study aimed to (1) extend theory by proposing how GenAI can support generative sense-making and (2) test its effects on conceptual knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust post-use and on conceptual knowledge, enjoyment, and behavioral intentions in a delayed follow-up. We conducted two between-subjects design experiments. Study 1 was a pre-registered experiment with 175 university students in an authentic cognitive psychology course, comparing ChatTutor with a generic GenAI system (ChatGPT) and a teaching-as-usual control. Study 2 replicated the design with 234 high school students, comparing ChatTutor to ChatGPT, and a re-study control. Results showed that ChatTutor significantly enhanced trust and enjoyment in both studies, and behavioral intentions in Study 1, compared to ChatGPT. It also improved conceptual knowledge over ChatGPT immediately in both studies and at follow-up in Study 2. ChatTutor outperformed the control condition in conceptual knowledge, although this difference was only significant in the follow-up of Study 1 and the immediate test of Study 2. Differences in self-efficacy were not significant. The research underscores the importance of integrating human-centered design and educational psychology theories into GenAI applications and offers directions for future research and practice.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 37(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Københavns Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
10.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.