Investigation of Failure Mechanism of Geogrid Reinforced Porous Concrete Based on Experimental Test

ABSTRACT The breakage behavior and damage mechanisms of geogrid‐reinforced porous concrete (GRPC) were evaluated through uniaxial compressive loading tests. Cubic samples measuring 15 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm were constructed with layered aggregates, incorporating 1 to 3 geogrids positioned at angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Testing was conducted in a rock mechanics laboratory, and strain‐stress curves were analyzed to examine mechanical behavior and fracture mechanisms. The breakage process of the GRPC was categorized into three stages: crack initiation, propagation, and final breakage. Results indicated that the mechanics and failure stages of GRPC differed significantly from those of ordinary concrete. In GRPC specimens, failure was primarily attributed to the sliding of aggregates and geogrid bonding layers, with cracks tending to propagate in stress concentration areas formed by connected or unconnected pores. Increasing the number of geogrids resulted in fewer fractures and reduced damage area. In tests with a consistent number of geogrids and concrete age, the horizontal geogrid configuration demonstrated a higher young modulus and failure stress compared to the vertical arrangement. Additionally, horizontal geogrid reinforcement caused delayed failure, while vertical reinforcement led to rapid breakage. A reduction in the number of geogrids led to a shift in breakage type, resulting in a more rapid and abrupt failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Failure Mechanism of Geogrid Reinforced Porous Concrete Based on Experimental Test

Hadi Haeri, Vahab Sarfarazi, Jinwei Fu, Mohammad Fatehi Marji et al.
1 citations
International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Investigation of Failure Mechanism of Geogrid Reinforced Porous Concrete Based on Experimental Test

Hadi Haeri, Vahab Sarfarazi, Jinwei Fu, Mohammad Fatehi Marji, Jiaxin Wei, Mohammad Mehdi Chehrepak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The breakage behavior and damage mechanisms of geogrid‐reinforced porous concrete (GRPC) were evaluated through uniaxial compressive loading tests. Cubic samples measuring 15 cm × 15 cm × 15 cm were constructed with layered aggregates, incorporating 1 to 3 geogrids positioned at angles of 0°, 45°, and 90°. Testing was conducted in a rock mechanics laboratory, and strain‐stress curves were analyzed to examine mechanical behavior and fracture mechanisms. The breakage process of the GRPC was categorized into three stages: crack initiation, propagation, and final breakage. Results indicated that the mechanics and failure stages of GRPC differed significantly from those of ordinary concrete. In GRPC specimens, failure was primarily attributed to the sliding of aggregates and geogrid bonding layers, with cracks tending to propagate in stress concentration areas formed by connected or unconnected pores. Increasing the number of geogrids resulted in fewer fractures and reduced damage area. In tests with a consistent number of geogrids and concrete age, the horizontal geogrid configuration demonstrated a higher young modulus and failure stress compared to the vertical arrangement. Additionally, horizontal geogrid reinforcement caused delayed failure, while vertical reinforcement led to rapid breakage. A reduction in the number of geogrids led to a shift in breakage type, resulting in a more rapid and abrupt failure.

International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsVol. 49(13)
Yazd University (IR), Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman (IR), Amirkabir University of Technology (IR), North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Hamedan University of Technology (IR)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.