Harnessing multiple domains of adaptive capacity: insights from the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract The global community has been faced with multiple shocks in recent years, including the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing climate-driven environmental changes. Whether and how people can respond to such shocks depends on multiple factors, collectively referred to as adaptive capacity. Here, we explore how people in five coastal Kenyan communities drew on multiple domains of adaptive capacity to respond to the food security, livelihood, and well-being impacts of COVID-19. We undertook qualitative interviews across three time periods through the first year of the pandemic. We analysed them using a combined deductive and inductive coding strategy based on a recently developed theoretical framework outlining six “domains” of adaptive capacity: assets, flexibility, social organisation, socio-cognitive constructs, learning, and agency. We found that people responded to the impacts of COVID-19 across a continuum from temporary coping strategies to more substantial adaptations and transformations. We not only found that people drew from all six domains of adaptive capacity but identified multiple interdependencies between these domains which shaped how they influenced responses. For example, people’s social networks (part of the organisation domain) played an important role in facilitating their access to assets and learning opportunities, and influenced their socio-cognitive constructs, which in turn influenced the adaptive actions they could take. Our findings suggest that policies and interventions to build adaptive capacity and resilience would benefit from a multi-dimensional approach that accounts for interactions between domains of adaptive capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Environmental Change
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-025-02421-w
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harnessing multiple domains of adaptive capacity: insights from the COVID-19 pandemic

Emmanuel Mbaru, Nyawira A. Muthiga, Michele L. Barnes, Jacqueline Lau et al.
Regional Environmental Change
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Harnessing multiple domains of adaptive capacity: insights from the COVID-19 pandemic

Emmanuel Mbaru, Nyawira A. Muthiga, Michele L. Barnes, Jacqueline Lau, Innocent Muly, Sarah Sutcliffe, Stephen Wanyonyi, Joshua E. Cinner
article en

Abstract

Abstract The global community has been faced with multiple shocks in recent years, including the COVID-19 pandemic and increasing climate-driven environmental changes. Whether and how people can respond to such shocks depends on multiple factors, collectively referred to as adaptive capacity. Here, we explore how people in five coastal Kenyan communities drew on multiple domains of adaptive capacity to respond to the food security, livelihood, and well-being impacts of COVID-19. We undertook qualitative interviews across three time periods through the first year of the pandemic. We analysed them using a combined deductive and inductive coding strategy based on a recently developed theoretical framework outlining six “domains” of adaptive capacity: assets, flexibility, social organisation, socio-cognitive constructs, learning, and agency. We found that people responded to the impacts of COVID-19 across a continuum from temporary coping strategies to more substantial adaptations and transformations. We not only found that people drew from all six domains of adaptive capacity but identified multiple interdependencies between these domains which shaped how they influenced responses. For example, people’s social networks (part of the organisation domain) played an important role in facilitating their access to assets and learning opportunities, and influenced their socio-cognitive constructs, which in turn influenced the adaptive actions they could take. Our findings suggest that policies and interventions to build adaptive capacity and resilience would benefit from a multi-dimensional approach that accounts for interactions between domains of adaptive capacity.

Regional Environmental ChangeVol. 25(3)
The University of Sydney (AU), Kenya Wildlife Service (KE), University of Exeter (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (AU), Sustainability Institute (ZA), Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KE), Lancaster University (GB), James Cook University (AU)
Wildlife Conservation Society, Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.