My place is at risk: spatial assessment of climate risk perceptions along the East Coast of Tasmania and related landscape value associations

Abstract Mapping landscape values alongside climate risk perceptions can show how collective values of the local community and their relationship to the landscape interacts spatially with their risk perception. Such geospatial social data could provide critical insight into local socioecological processes and inform successful place-based climate adaptation planning and risk management outcomes. This study builds on existing landscape value and climate risk participatory mapping methods to identify specific landscape value and risk perception associations. By doing so, prioritisation and targeting of management actions could be informed based on the type of landscape values assigned to a given location, and the perceived vulnerabilities of that place. Our approach combined participatory mapping of landscape values and ‘places at risk’ and follow-up interviews with local community members living along a highly climate vulnerable, coastal region in Tasmania, Australia. Results demonstrated that people’s perceptions of risk were strongly associated with their landscape values. Individuals were more likely to perceive risks and respond to risks that they have experience with (e.g. bushfire); and those that they have directly observed as threats to the landscape values that define their relationship with that place. Thus, risks that are unfamiliar (e.g. flooding and storm surge) were less perceived, and related actions were disregarded. Priority management zones were identified based on the spatial co-occurrence or ‘bundling’ of mapped risks and values. This can inform targeted management strategies in the region based on local context and can also indicate the type of actions needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Environmental Change
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-025-02400-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My place is at risk: spatial assessment of climate risk perceptions along the East Coast of Tasmania and related landscape value associations

GT Pecl, Vanessa M. Adams, Elizabeth Lester, D.Y. Jayakody
1 citations
Regional Environmental Change
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
article

My place is at risk: spatial assessment of climate risk perceptions along the East Coast of Tasmania and related landscape value associations

GT Pecl, Vanessa M. Adams, Elizabeth Lester, D.Y. Jayakody
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Mapping landscape values alongside climate risk perceptions can show how collective values of the local community and their relationship to the landscape interacts spatially with their risk perception. Such geospatial social data could provide critical insight into local socioecological processes and inform successful place-based climate adaptation planning and risk management outcomes. This study builds on existing landscape value and climate risk participatory mapping methods to identify specific landscape value and risk perception associations. By doing so, prioritisation and targeting of management actions could be informed based on the type of landscape values assigned to a given location, and the perceived vulnerabilities of that place. Our approach combined participatory mapping of landscape values and ‘places at risk’ and follow-up interviews with local community members living along a highly climate vulnerable, coastal region in Tasmania, Australia. Results demonstrated that people’s perceptions of risk were strongly associated with their landscape values. Individuals were more likely to perceive risks and respond to risks that they have experience with (e.g. bushfire); and those that they have directly observed as threats to the landscape values that define their relationship with that place. Thus, risks that are unfamiliar (e.g. flooding and storm surge) were less perceived, and related actions were disregarded. Priority management zones were identified based on the spatial co-occurrence or ‘bundling’ of mapped risks and values. This can inform targeted management strategies in the region based on local context and can also indicate the type of actions needed.

Regional Environmental ChangeVol. 25(3)
University of Tasmania (AU), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), Monash University (AU)
University of Tasmania
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.