Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets

Abstract Current national emissions targets fall short of the Paris Agreement goals, prompting the need for equitable ways to close this gap. Fair emissions allowances rely on effort-sharing formulas based on fairness principles, yielding diverse outcomes. These variations, shaped by normative decisions, complicate policymaking and legal assessments of climate targets. Here we provide up-to-date numbers, comprehensively accounting for three dimensions—physical and social uncertainties, global strategies and equity—and the relative impact of them on each country’s emissions allowance. In the short run, normative considerations substantially impact fair emissions allowances—directing current discussions to this debate—while global discussions on temperature targets and non-CO 2 emissions take over in the long run. We identify many countries with insufficient nationally determined contributions in light of fairness and discuss implications for increased domestic mitigation and financing emissions reductions abroad—yielding a total international finance flux of $US0.5–7.4 trillion in 2030.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02361-7
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets

Isabela Schmidt Tagomori, Michel den Elzen, Andries F. Hof, Nicole J. van den Berg et al.
13 citations
Nature Climate Change
Climate Change Policy and Economics
40.70
article

Navigating the black box of fair national emissions targets

Isabela Schmidt Tagomori, Michel den Elzen, Andries F. Hof, Nicole J. van den Berg, Vassilis Daioglou, Rik van Heerden, Mark Dekker, Yann Robiou du Pont, Detlef Peter van Vuuren, Chantal Würschinger, Elena Hooijschuur
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Abstract Current national emissions targets fall short of the Paris Agreement goals, prompting the need for equitable ways to close this gap. Fair emissions allowances rely on effort-sharing formulas based on fairness principles, yielding diverse outcomes. These variations, shaped by normative decisions, complicate policymaking and legal assessments of climate targets. Here we provide up-to-date numbers, comprehensively accounting for three dimensions—physical and social uncertainties, global strategies and equity—and the relative impact of them on each country’s emissions allowance. In the short run, normative considerations substantially impact fair emissions allowances—directing current discussions to this debate—while global discussions on temperature targets and non-CO 2 emissions take over in the long run. We identify many countries with insufficient nationally determined contributions in light of fairness and discuss implications for increased domestic mitigation and financing emissions reductions abroad—yielding a total international finance flux of $US0.5–7.4 trillion in 2030.

Nature Climate ChangeVol. 15(7)
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL), Utrecht University (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Energy Transitions (United Kingdom) (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
40.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.