Conceptual Profile of Chemical Analysis

Abstract Chemical analysis is a fundamental concept in chemistry, which is characterized by polysemy observed in both scientific and everyday language, which are both employed in science classrooms. Our work aims at developing a conceptual profile model of chemical analysis as a methodological tool for describing the heterogeneity of students’ ways of thinking about the concept of chemical analysis. In this study, we present our findings resulting from an inductive qualitative analysis of secondary data obtained from the historical and epistemological literature (sociocultural domain) and students’ alternative conceptions and thinking (ontogenetic domain) in a dialogic way. A preliminary classification of the ways of thinking about chemical analysis is proposed: chemical analysis as (a) everyday analysis, (b) alchemical analysis, (c) empirical analysis, (d) classical analysis, (e) classical instrumental analysis, and (f) a contemporary tool for society. Proposed categories of ways of thinking are established and stabilized by ontological, epistemological, and axiological commitments, which were identified during data analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science & Education
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00663-y
Primary Topic
Various Chemistry Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Profile of Chemical Analysis

Κατερίνα Σάλτα, Dionysios Koulougliotis, Maria Mavridi
Science & Education
Various Chemistry Research Topics
article

Conceptual Profile of Chemical Analysis

Κατερίνα Σάλτα, Dionysios Koulougliotis, Maria Mavridi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chemical analysis is a fundamental concept in chemistry, which is characterized by polysemy observed in both scientific and everyday language, which are both employed in science classrooms. Our work aims at developing a conceptual profile model of chemical analysis as a methodological tool for describing the heterogeneity of students’ ways of thinking about the concept of chemical analysis. In this study, we present our findings resulting from an inductive qualitative analysis of secondary data obtained from the historical and epistemological literature (sociocultural domain) and students’ alternative conceptions and thinking (ontogenetic domain) in a dialogic way. A preliminary classification of the ways of thinking about chemical analysis is proposed: chemical analysis as (a) everyday analysis, (b) alchemical analysis, (c) empirical analysis, (d) classical analysis, (e) classical instrumental analysis, and (f) a contemporary tool for society. Proposed categories of ways of thinking are established and stabilized by ontological, epistemological, and axiological commitments, which were identified during data analysis.

Science & Education
Ionian University (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Various Chemistry Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.