“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline

More than fifteen years have passed since Jaishankar (2008) published the editorial, ?What ails Victimology?? in the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, in which he outlined his perceptions of why victimology has struggled to be recognized as a distinct academic discipline. We revisit the five areas outlined in Jaishankar?s (2008) argument and explore the growth of the victimology discipline over the past decade and a half. The exploration considers theoretical development, content of published scholarly journal articles, courses, curricular programs, published academic books, and peer-reviewed journals, from 2008 to 2023. It is concluded that most of the ?symptomatic failings? that Jaishankar (2008: 2) outlined as hampering the growth of victimology seem to be resolved, including concerns about acceptance of the discipline in the larger international community. However, there is room for new theoretical developments in victimology and more graduate-level degree programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Temida
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/tem2501127b
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline

Dawn Beichner, Chadley James, Bothwell Piason
Temida
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline

Dawn Beichner, Chadley James, Bothwell Piason
article en

Abstract

More than fifteen years have passed since Jaishankar (2008) published the editorial, ?What ails Victimology?? in the International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, in which he outlined his perceptions of why victimology has struggled to be recognized as a distinct academic discipline. We revisit the five areas outlined in Jaishankar?s (2008) argument and explore the growth of the victimology discipline over the past decade and a half. The exploration considers theoretical development, content of published scholarly journal articles, courses, curricular programs, published academic books, and peer-reviewed journals, from 2008 to 2023. It is concluded that most of the ?symptomatic failings? that Jaishankar (2008: 2) outlined as hampering the growth of victimology seem to be resolved, including concerns about acceptance of the discipline in the larger international community. However, there is room for new theoretical developments in victimology and more graduate-level degree programs.

TemidaVol. 28(1)
Illinois State University (US), Arizona State University (US), California State University, Fresno (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“What ails victimology?” Revisited: Assessing the growth and development of victimology as an academic discipline — Dawn Beichner, Chadley James, et al. · Temida (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS