Dynamics of Swedish Political Constitutionalism: Towards a Transition to Legal Constitutionalism

Sweden has long been known as a country where constitutionalism was predominantly carried out through political processes. In these processes, the implementation and interpretation of constitutional norms and principles were mainly conducted through political institutions and mechanisms. Political processes, notably parliamentary decisionmaking and executive actions have increasingly overshadowed the traditional role of legal institutions in interpreting and enforcing constitutional principles. However, in recent decades, Swedish constitutionalism has undergone a significant transformation, evolving from a political approach to a legal one. The judiciary has increasingly taken on a greater role in interpreting and applying the constitution, while constitutional review mechanisms have been strengthened. This study delves into the dynamics of Swedish political constitutionalism and examines the potential for a shift towards legal constitutionalism. Through a thorough exploration of these dynamics, this study sheds light on the evolving landscape of constitutional governance in Sweden.