Translating Hepatitis D Virus Screening Cost-Effectiveness into Practice: The Case for Reflex Testing in the United States

We read with great interest the recent study by Toy et al. demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of one-time hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing among HBsAg-positive adults in the United States.i As the authors highlight, HDV is the most aggressive form of viral hepatitis, yet only ~13% of adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are ever tested in the US.ii We commend the authors for advocating for universal HDV screening in HBsAg-positive adults in the US, as advised by the European Association for the Study of the Liver.iii Recommending one-time HDV screening on account of its cost-effectiveness is a step in the right direction, but efforts should be made to consider how we may optimize implementation to ensure the testing is done.CDC guidance recommends a one-time HBV triple panel screen for all adults, which is an ideal opportunity to also implement reflex HDV testing.iv Reflex testing may prove to be even more impactful and cost-effective, reducing potential missed diagnoses and detecting patients earlier in their disease course.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf324
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translating Hepatitis D Virus Screening Cost-Effectiveness into Practice: The Case for Reflex Testing in the United States

Andrea D. Branch, Anna Mageras, Nina Rodriguez, Douglas T. Dieterich et al.
1 citations
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.32
article

Translating Hepatitis D Virus Screening Cost-Effectiveness into Practice: The Case for Reflex Testing in the United States

Andrea D. Branch, Anna Mageras, Nina Rodriguez, Douglas T. Dieterich, Frances Lee, Tatyana Kushner, Lauren Alpert, Xiaotao Zhang, Cecilia Katzenstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We read with great interest the recent study by Toy et al. demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of one-time hepatitis delta virus (HDV) testing among HBsAg-positive adults in the United States.i As the authors highlight, HDV is the most aggressive form of viral hepatitis, yet only ~13% of adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) are ever tested in the US.ii We commend the authors for advocating for universal HDV screening in HBsAg-positive adults in the US, as advised by the European Association for the Study of the Liver.iii Recommending one-time HDV screening on account of its cost-effectiveness is a step in the right direction, but efforts should be made to consider how we may optimize implementation to ensure the testing is done.CDC guidance recommends a one-time HBV triple panel screen for all adults, which is an ideal opportunity to also implement reflex HDV testing.iv Reflex testing may prove to be even more impactful and cost-effective, reducing potential missed diagnoses and detecting patients earlier in their disease course.

Clinical Infectious DiseasesVol. 81(5)
Cornell University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, Ipsen, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.