Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in the two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in the UK

<b>Objective:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK. Early identification and timely intervention rely heavily on the faecal immunohistochemical test (FIT). However, FIT diagnostic accuracy varies, with a sensitivity ranging between 85% and 94% and a noteworthy negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas in patients referred through the 2-week wait (2WW) referral pathway following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG12 criteria. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1841 patients who were referred through the 2WW pathway. Data on clinical characteristics, FIT test positivity (faecal haemoglobin ≥ 10 µg/g), and subsequent investigations were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV were calculated based on the presence of adenomas (≥10 mm) or malignancies. <b>Results:</b> Positive FIT results were observed in 73.4%, negative FIT in 25.9%, and 0.65% of patients lacked FIT availability. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CRC detection compared to the presence of advanced adenoma or CRC were 96.49% vs. 93.6%, 26.56% vs. 30.2%, 7.31% vs. 21.8%, and 99.18% vs. 95.8%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> FIT showed the expected performance for CRC detection with an NPV of 99.18%, but a negative FIT result should not exclude investigation with colonoscopy due to a 4.2% likelihood of missing advanced adenomas. There is still a need for other types of testing for CRC screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Screening
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09691413251347724
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in the two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in the UK

Juan De La Revilla Negro, Dylan Peter McClurg, Sikandar Khan, Irene Jessel et al.
Journal of Medical Screening
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in the two-week wait referral pathway for colorectal cancer in the UK

Juan De La Revilla Negro, Dylan Peter McClurg, Sikandar Khan, Irene Jessel, Madeleine Frank, Bianca Hanganu, Ioanna Panagiotopoulou, Sarala Janarthanan, Nilanga Nishad, Ciaran Padhiar, Joshua E. Elias, Ahlam-Nourelhouda Boussaid Othmani, M. Denton, Gareth Corbett
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK. Early identification and timely intervention rely heavily on the faecal immunohistochemical test (FIT). However, FIT diagnostic accuracy varies, with a sensitivity ranging between 85% and 94% and a noteworthy negative predictive value (NPV) of 99%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FIT in detecting CRC and advanced adenomas in patients referred through the 2-week wait (2WW) referral pathway following the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG12 criteria. <b>Method:</b> A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1841 patients who were referred through the 2WW pathway. Data on clinical characteristics, FIT test positivity (faecal haemoglobin ≥ 10 µg/g), and subsequent investigations were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and NPV were calculated based on the presence of adenomas (≥10 mm) or malignancies. <b>Results:</b> Positive FIT results were observed in 73.4%, negative FIT in 25.9%, and 0.65% of patients lacked FIT availability. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CRC detection compared to the presence of advanced adenoma or CRC were 96.49% vs. 93.6%, 26.56% vs. 30.2%, 7.31% vs. 21.8%, and 99.18% vs. 95.8%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> FIT showed the expected performance for CRC detection with an NPV of 99.18%, but a negative FIT result should not exclude investigation with colonoscopy due to a 4.2% likelihood of missing advanced adenomas. There is still a need for other types of testing for CRC screening.

Journal of Medical ScreeningVol. 33(1)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.