Quantifying Uncertainties in Solar Wind Forecasting due to Incomplete Solar Magnetic Field Information

Abstract Solar wind forecasting plays a crucial role in space weather prediction, yet significant uncertainties persist duet to incomplete magnetic field observations of the Sun. Isolating the solar wind forecasting errors due to these effects is difficult. This study investigates the uncertainties in solar wind models arising from these limitations. We simulate magnetic field maps with known uncertainties, including far-side and polar field variations, as well as resolution and sensitivity limitations. These maps serve as input for three solar wind models: the Wang–Sheeley–Arge, the Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation, and the European Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset. We analyze the discrepancies in solar wind forecasts, particularly the solar wind speed at Earth’s location, by comparing the results of these models to a created ground truth magnetic field map, which is derived from a synthetic solar rotation evolution using the Advective Flux Transport model. The results reveal significant variations within each model with a root mean square error ranging from 59 to 121 km s −1 . Further comparison with the thermodynamic Magnetohydrodynamic Algorithm outside a Sphere model indicates that uncertainties in the different models can lead to even larger variations in solar wind forecasts compared to those within a single model. However, predicting a range of solar wind velocities based on a cloud of points around Earth can help mitigate uncertainties by up to 20%–77%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adcf9e
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Uncertainties in Solar Wind Forecasting due to Incomplete Solar Magnetic Field Information

Lisa Upton, M. J. Owens, Shaela I. Jones, C. N. Arge et al.
3 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
3.46
article

Quantifying Uncertainties in Solar Wind Forecasting due to Incomplete Solar Magnetic Field Information

Lisa Upton, M. J. Owens, Shaela I. Jones, C. N. Arge, Stephan G. Heinemann, Ronald M. Caplan, Bibhuti Kumar Jha, Jens Pomoell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Solar wind forecasting plays a crucial role in space weather prediction, yet significant uncertainties persist duet to incomplete magnetic field observations of the Sun. Isolating the solar wind forecasting errors due to these effects is difficult. This study investigates the uncertainties in solar wind models arising from these limitations. We simulate magnetic field maps with known uncertainties, including far-side and polar field variations, as well as resolution and sensitivity limitations. These maps serve as input for three solar wind models: the Wang–Sheeley–Arge, the Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation, and the European Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset. We analyze the discrepancies in solar wind forecasts, particularly the solar wind speed at Earth’s location, by comparing the results of these models to a created ground truth magnetic field map, which is derived from a synthetic solar rotation evolution using the Advective Flux Transport model. The results reveal significant variations within each model with a root mean square error ranging from 59 to 121 km s −1 . Further comparison with the thermodynamic Magnetohydrodynamic Algorithm outside a Sphere model indicates that uncertainties in the different models can lead to even larger variations in solar wind forecasts compared to those within a single model. However, predicting a range of solar wind velocities based on a cloud of points around Earth can help mitigate uncertainties by up to 20%–77%.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 986(2)
Southwest Research Institute (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki Institute of Physics (FI), Heliophysics (US), Predictive Science (United States) (US), University of Reading (GB)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.