Subtropical southern Africa fire emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia obtained with satellite observations and GEOS-Chem
Landscape fires in subtropical southern Africa (2-20°S) are a prominent regional source of nitrogen oxides (NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> ) and ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>), affecting climate and air quality as precursors of tropospheric ozone and aerosols. Here we evaluate GEOS-Chem model skill at reproducing satellite observations of vertical column densities of NO<sub>2</sub> from TROPOMI and NH<sub>3</sub> from IASI driven with three distinct and widely used biomass burning inventories (FINNv2.5, GFEDv4s, GFASv1.2). We identify that GFASv1.2 use of fire radiative power and a NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emission factor that is almost half that used by the other two inventories is most consistent with TROPOMI and that FINNv2.5 use of active fires and landscape-specific fuel loads and biomass consumed is most consistent with IASI. We use a simple mass-balance inversion to calculate top-down NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions of 1.9 ± 0.6 Tg NO for June-October and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions of 1.2 ± 0.4 Tg for July-October. All inventories collocate NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, whereas most of the pronounced emissions of NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> are separate and have distinct seasonality in the top-down estimate. We infer with GEOS-Chem more efficient ozone production (13 Tg ozone per Tg NO) with the top-down informed NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions than the inventory emissions, as GFASv1.2 NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> is almost 20% less than top-down NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and the 2.3- to 2.5-times greater FINNv2.5 and GFEDv4s NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> reduces sensitivity of ozone formation to NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> . Both NO <sub><i>x</i></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> top-down emissions are unaffected by use of plume injection heights, limited to GFASv1.2 in GEOS-Chem, and NH<sub>3</sub> is insensitive to acidic sulfate and nitrate aerosol emissions absent in all inventories. The top-down emissions estimates and comparison to satellite observations suggest a hybrid bottom-up approach could be adopted to discern byproducts of smouldering and flaming fires.
Authors
- Lieven Clarisse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-2141)
- Eloïse A. Marais (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-8051)
- Killian Murphy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-8248)
- Christine Wiedinmyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-6592)
- Guido R. van der Werf (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-8630)
- Martin Van Damme (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-0558)
Institutions
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BE)
- University College London (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Environmental Science Atmospheres
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ea00041f
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.21
Funders
- European Commission
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
- European Research Council