Thick Narratives and the Value of Minor Details

Abstract Much social scientific work employs thick exemplary narratives— detailed stories of particular individuals that are supposed to exemplify broader social processes. However, a number of recent critics have argued that such narratives are a poor means of achieving social-scientific aims. Exemplary narratives provide high-resolution detail about particular cases, but such high-resolution detail is irrelevant and distracting if our aim is to understand more general causal dynamics in the social world. This paper defends the use of thick exemplary narratives by providing an account of how high-resolution details of individual stories (i) serve social scientific aims besides description and causal explanation and (ii) enable readers to better “grasp” causal-explanatory claims, even when those details are not themselves parts of the broader causal processes that are of interest to social scientists. Moreover, objections to exemplary narratives in social science can be generalized to the use of exemplars in other domains, so understanding how to address them in this context offers guidance for responding to similar objections in other contexts, such as moral philosophy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topoi
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10180-w
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thick Narratives and the Value of Minor Details

Alexander Prescott‐Couch
Topoi
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Thick Narratives and the Value of Minor Details

Alexander Prescott‐Couch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Much social scientific work employs thick exemplary narratives— detailed stories of particular individuals that are supposed to exemplify broader social processes. However, a number of recent critics have argued that such narratives are a poor means of achieving social-scientific aims. Exemplary narratives provide high-resolution detail about particular cases, but such high-resolution detail is irrelevant and distracting if our aim is to understand more general causal dynamics in the social world. This paper defends the use of thick exemplary narratives by providing an account of how high-resolution details of individual stories (i) serve social scientific aims besides description and causal explanation and (ii) enable readers to better “grasp” causal-explanatory claims, even when those details are not themselves parts of the broader causal processes that are of interest to social scientists. Moreover, objections to exemplary narratives in social science can be generalized to the use of exemplars in other domains, so understanding how to address them in this context offers guidance for responding to similar objections in other contexts, such as moral philosophy.

TopoiVol. 44(4)
University of Oxford (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.