Understanding the role of community membership in journalistic authority claims: a framework informed by boundary work and fan studies

Abstract Digitalization and declines in news use underscore the tension between journalistic ideals of detachment and audience communities’ demands for journalistic actors’ engagement. This is enhanced by the emergence of non-traditional actors who can effectively assert journalistic authority within communities by deviating from specific traditional journalistic values. However, scholarly understanding of the role of community membership in claims of journalistic authority remains limited. To address this, we propose a theoretical framework that draws on boundary work and fan studies. This framework allows us to examine how diverse journalistic actors in a variety of communities can base their journalistic authority claims on their: (1) proximity to news sources and protagonists; (2) authenticity as perceived by the audience community; and (3) professionalism in relation to the journalistic field. Through empirical research, this framework may help us to better understand how diverse journalistic actors can claim authority while meeting communities’ diverse needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Theory
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the role of community membership in journalistic authority claims: a framework informed by boundary work and fan studies

Jonathan Hendrickx, Phoebe Maares, Folker Hanusch, Clara Juarez Miro
1 citations
Communication Theory
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
article

Understanding the role of community membership in journalistic authority claims: a framework informed by boundary work and fan studies

Jonathan Hendrickx, Phoebe Maares, Folker Hanusch, Clara Juarez Miro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Digitalization and declines in news use underscore the tension between journalistic ideals of detachment and audience communities’ demands for journalistic actors’ engagement. This is enhanced by the emergence of non-traditional actors who can effectively assert journalistic authority within communities by deviating from specific traditional journalistic values. However, scholarly understanding of the role of community membership in claims of journalistic authority remains limited. To address this, we propose a theoretical framework that draws on boundary work and fan studies. This framework allows us to examine how diverse journalistic actors in a variety of communities can base their journalistic authority claims on their: (1) proximity to news sources and protagonists; (2) authenticity as perceived by the audience community; and (3) professionalism in relation to the journalistic field. Through empirical research, this framework may help us to better understand how diverse journalistic actors can claim authority while meeting communities’ diverse needs.

Communication TheoryVol. 35(4)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Vienna (AT), Barcelona Graduate School of Mathematics (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), University of Tübingen (DE)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the role of community membership in journalistic authority claims: a framework informed by boundary work and fan studies — Jonathan Hendrickx, Phoebe Maares, et al. · Communication Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS