Evaluating multi-dimensional risks embodied in the global supply chain of lithium-ion batteries

• Global supply chain risks in the lithium-ion battery industry are evaluated • Supply disruptions, demand competition, and vulnerability factors are integrated • We identify high-risk profiles for lithium hydroxide and LIB production • Strategies for diversifying supply chains and enhancing resilience are provided Driven by the development of e-mobility and renewable power, recent years saw a surging demand for battery materials along with concerns about the supply chain stability. Previous studies have assessed such risks from multiple perspectives while the whole picture is still unclear. This study evaluated global supply chain risks in the lithium-ion battery (LIB) industry, covering 238 countries and regions and 15 key LIB-related commodities. We integrated three dimensions to develop a risk assessment model: the probability of production disruptions, competition risk, and vulnerability, offering a holistic view of both supply- and demand-side risks. The results reveal that lithium hydroxide and LIB exhibit the highest supply chain risks, primarily due to concentrated production and widely dispersed demand. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, and the United States face elevated supply chain risks. Early adopters of low-cobalt technologies have somewhat mitigated risks by reducing their exposure to resource competition. Based on these findings, the study underscores the importance of diversifying supply chains and accelerating technological transitions. The efforts to assess and improve resilience at high geographic and technical granularity are further highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2025.200266
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating multi-dimensional risks embodied in the global supply chain of lithium-ion batteries

Yiran Yang, Xin Sun
3 citations
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
article

Evaluating multi-dimensional risks embodied in the global supply chain of lithium-ion batteries

Yiran Yang, Xin Sun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Global supply chain risks in the lithium-ion battery industry are evaluated • Supply disruptions, demand competition, and vulnerability factors are integrated • We identify high-risk profiles for lithium hydroxide and LIB production • Strategies for diversifying supply chains and enhancing resilience are provided Driven by the development of e-mobility and renewable power, recent years saw a surging demand for battery materials along with concerns about the supply chain stability. Previous studies have assessed such risks from multiple perspectives while the whole picture is still unclear. This study evaluated global supply chain risks in the lithium-ion battery (LIB) industry, covering 238 countries and regions and 15 key LIB-related commodities. We integrated three dimensions to develop a risk assessment model: the probability of production disruptions, competition risk, and vulnerability, offering a holistic view of both supply- and demand-side risks. The results reveal that lithium hydroxide and LIB exhibit the highest supply chain risks, primarily due to concentrated production and widely dispersed demand. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, and the United States face elevated supply chain risks. Early adopters of low-cobalt technologies have somewhat mitigated risks by reducing their exposure to resource competition. Based on these findings, the study underscores the importance of diversifying supply chains and accelerating technological transitions. The efforts to assess and improve resilience at high geographic and technical granularity are further highlighted.

Resources Conservation & Recycling AdvancesVol. 27
University of Groningen (NL), Cornell University (US)
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Extraction and Separation Processes
2.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.