Paddy Harvesting Based on Acreage or Paddy Harvesting Based on Weight: A Comparative Study on Combine Harvesting Loss

Losses during paddy harvesting have been a common issue in Malaysia. Currently, there are two methods of harvesting charges, either based on acreage or based on weight. There is a need to observe the harvesting loss effects based on these harvesting charge methods. The experiment was conducted in MADA Regional Farmers’ Organization (PPK) E-IV, Kota Sarang Semut, Kedah, using only reconditioned tangential-flow type combines provided by MADA. The combines used recommended, optimized settings to ensure reduced harvesting losses. Harvesting losses were measured using both acreage-based and weight-based harvesting charges. Harvesting losses were also measured using three different types of harvesting speed: 3.6 km/h (low), 4.5 km/h (medium) and 6.1 km/h (high). Results showed that the average harvesting loss using the weight-based method was 1.3%, while the average harvesting loss using the acreage-based method was 4.6%. Regarding harvesting speed, a low speed resulted in an average harvesting loss of 1%, while a moderate speed resulted in an average harvesting loss of 2%. The top harvesting speed produced an average harvesting loss of 2.6%. Results showed that any harvesting charge method can be applied as long as combine harvesters are properly adjusted according to the recommended settings provided by MARDI SOP. Combine harvester operators should ensure their combine harvesters follow the recommended machine settings and harvesting speed to achieve lower harvesting losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36877/aafrj.a0000380
Primary Topic
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paddy Harvesting Based on Acreage or Paddy Harvesting Based on Weight: A Comparative Study on Combine Harvesting Loss

Mohamad Fakhrul Zaman Omar, Mohamed Fauzi Md Isa, Eddy Herman Sharu, Ahmad Sukri Saad et al.
Advances in Agricultural and Food Research Journal
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
article

Paddy Harvesting Based on Acreage or Paddy Harvesting Based on Weight: A Comparative Study on Combine Harvesting Loss

Mohamad Fakhrul Zaman Omar, Mohamed Fauzi Md Isa, Eddy Herman Sharu, Ahmad Sukri Saad, Muhammad Haniff Ahmad, Anuar Abdullah, Mohd Khusairy Khadzir, Mohd Shahril Shah Mohd Ghazali, Mohd Taufik Ahmad, Mohamad Aufa Md Bookheri, Mohamad Ashraf Mohamad Puzi, Wan Mohd Aznan Wan Ahamad
article en

Abstract

Losses during paddy harvesting have been a common issue in Malaysia. Currently, there are two methods of harvesting charges, either based on acreage or based on weight. There is a need to observe the harvesting loss effects based on these harvesting charge methods. The experiment was conducted in MADA Regional Farmers’ Organization (PPK) E-IV, Kota Sarang Semut, Kedah, using only reconditioned tangential-flow type combines provided by MADA. The combines used recommended, optimized settings to ensure reduced harvesting losses. Harvesting losses were measured using both acreage-based and weight-based harvesting charges. Harvesting losses were also measured using three different types of harvesting speed: 3.6 km/h (low), 4.5 km/h (medium) and 6.1 km/h (high). Results showed that the average harvesting loss using the weight-based method was 1.3%, while the average harvesting loss using the acreage-based method was 4.6%. Regarding harvesting speed, a low speed resulted in an average harvesting loss of 1%, while a moderate speed resulted in an average harvesting loss of 2%. The top harvesting speed produced an average harvesting loss of 2.6%. Results showed that any harvesting charge method can be applied as long as combine harvesters are properly adjusted according to the recommended settings provided by MARDI SOP. Combine harvester operators should ensure their combine harvesters follow the recommended machine settings and harvesting speed to achieve lower harvesting losses.

Advances in Agricultural and Food Research JournalVol. 6(1)
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.