Exploring teachers’ beliefs about learning principles

Teachers hold conscious or subconscious beliefs about pedagogy, education and learning that are deeply ingrained and steer their daily pedagogical reasoning. Numerous studies have aimed to reveal these beliefs, but whether specifically principles of learning are part of teachers’ beliefs has not yet been addressed. This study investigated whether teachers’ explicit and implicit beliefs are consistent with scientific principles of learning. For that purpose, a multiple-component online test was constructed. In an implicit word association task, participants had to categorize words as being linked with learning or not, with the responses and their speed analyzed for what they might reveal about beliefs about learning. In an explicit classroom statement task, participants were presented with a statement about actions in the classroom that either were or were not in line with principles of learning and asked how firmly they believed it was true (or false) and on what basis. Finally, in an explicit principle endorsement task, participants were asked how convinced they were that 10 principles of learning taken from an American Psychological Association consensus list were correct. A total of 257 pre-service and in-service teachers, teacher educators and educational scientists completed the test. Results showed that on average, 80% of the teachers did believe that the 10 principles presented were correct, although not all were endorsed with a high degree of conviction. In the implicit word association task, response times for words associated with learning were generally shorter than for other types of school related words. One principle, that adaptation of existing concepts is a slow process, was an anomaly on both tasks. Correlations between the implicit and explicit results were low. In conclusion, implicit and explicit responses reflect teacher beliefs about learning that are generally consistent with scientific learning principles, although the backing for some principles is less strong than for others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1576123
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring teachers’ beliefs about learning principles

Erik Meij, Anneke Smits, Martijn Meeter
3 citations
Frontiers in Education
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
12.60
article

Exploring teachers’ beliefs about learning principles

Erik Meij, Anneke Smits, Martijn Meeter
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Teachers hold conscious or subconscious beliefs about pedagogy, education and learning that are deeply ingrained and steer their daily pedagogical reasoning. Numerous studies have aimed to reveal these beliefs, but whether specifically principles of learning are part of teachers’ beliefs has not yet been addressed. This study investigated whether teachers’ explicit and implicit beliefs are consistent with scientific principles of learning. For that purpose, a multiple-component online test was constructed. In an implicit word association task, participants had to categorize words as being linked with learning or not, with the responses and their speed analyzed for what they might reveal about beliefs about learning. In an explicit classroom statement task, participants were presented with a statement about actions in the classroom that either were or were not in line with principles of learning and asked how firmly they believed it was true (or false) and on what basis. Finally, in an explicit principle endorsement task, participants were asked how convinced they were that 10 principles of learning taken from an American Psychological Association consensus list were correct. A total of 257 pre-service and in-service teachers, teacher educators and educational scientists completed the test. Results showed that on average, 80% of the teachers did believe that the 10 principles presented were correct, although not all were endorsed with a high degree of conviction. In the implicit word association task, response times for words associated with learning were generally shorter than for other types of school related words. One principle, that adaptation of existing concepts is a slow process, was an anomaly on both tasks. Correlations between the implicit and explicit results were low. In conclusion, implicit and explicit responses reflect teacher beliefs about learning that are generally consistent with scientific learning principles, although the backing for some principles is less strong than for others.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.