Evaluation of plot level aggregation statistics for spectral grain yield prediction

Spectral imaging has become popular through the advancement of UAV platforms and is available at increased spatial resolution, especially from RGB and multispectral (MS) sensors. While collecting high resolution spectral data on the plot level is important for accounting for within-plot heterogeneities, reference data is commonly available only on the plot level, thus aggregated to a single value as in the case of grain yield (GY). Therefore, spectral data within plots are generally aggregated (downsampled) to the plot level with the aim of creating a common level of spatial resolution. This holds the advantage of data reduction while potentially losing valuable information. Therefore, this study compares the performance of different aggregation outputs (percentiles) of multispectral and RGB UAV-based data for GY prediction of winter wheat. Correlations varied depending on spectral data, measurement dates and trials. Overall, correlations were found to decrease for percentiles below 20 % and above 85 %, respectively, but to be relatively stable for percentiles in between. In addition, the correlations obtained from mean and median values did not reveal a substantial difference. Results confirm the common choice of median or mean values while lowest and highest percentiles should be avoided irrespective of spectral parameter and growth stage. • Squared correlations (r²) of spectral data with grain yield were compared for percentiles on plot/sensor aggregation level. • r² were similar for a plateau of medium percentiles (20–85 %), but lower at lowest and highest percentiles. • r² from median and mean were comparable to r² from the 20–85 % percentiles. • The median can be recommended as a robust quantile. • The ranking of percentiles did not differ substantially by dates, trials, spectral bands and vegetation indices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127733
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of plot level aggregation statistics for spectral grain yield prediction

Lukas Prey, Patrick Noack, Johannes Seidl-Schulz
1 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
0.75
article

Evaluation of plot level aggregation statistics for spectral grain yield prediction

Lukas Prey, Patrick Noack, Johannes Seidl-Schulz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Spectral imaging has become popular through the advancement of UAV platforms and is available at increased spatial resolution, especially from RGB and multispectral (MS) sensors. While collecting high resolution spectral data on the plot level is important for accounting for within-plot heterogeneities, reference data is commonly available only on the plot level, thus aggregated to a single value as in the case of grain yield (GY). Therefore, spectral data within plots are generally aggregated (downsampled) to the plot level with the aim of creating a common level of spatial resolution. This holds the advantage of data reduction while potentially losing valuable information. Therefore, this study compares the performance of different aggregation outputs (percentiles) of multispectral and RGB UAV-based data for GY prediction of winter wheat. Correlations varied depending on spectral data, measurement dates and trials. Overall, correlations were found to decrease for percentiles below 20 % and above 85 %, respectively, but to be relatively stable for percentiles in between. In addition, the correlations obtained from mean and median values did not reveal a substantial difference. Results confirm the common choice of median or mean values while lowest and highest percentiles should be avoided irrespective of spectral parameter and growth stage. • Squared correlations (r²) of spectral data with grain yield were compared for percentiles on plot/sensor aggregation level. • r² were similar for a plateau of medium percentiles (20–85 %), but lower at lowest and highest percentiles. • r² from median and mean were comparable to r² from the 20–85 % percentiles. • The median can be recommended as a robust quantile. • The ranking of percentiles did not differ substantially by dates, trials, spectral bands and vegetation indices.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 170
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), Schmolz Bickenbach (Germany) (DE)
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.