Importance of data collection and subgroup analyses in research methodology

Data collection serves as the cornerstone in the study of clinical research questions. Two types of data are commonly utilized in medicine: (1) Qualitative; and (2) Quantitative. Several methods are commonly employed to gather data, regardless of whether retrospective or prospective studies are used: (1) Interviews; (2) Observational methods; (3) Questionnaires; (4) Investigation parameters; (5) Medical records; and (6) Electronic chart reviews. Each source type has its own advantages and cons in terms of the accuracy and availability of the data to be extracted. We will focus on the important parts of the research methodology: (1) Data collection; and (2) Subgroup analyses. Errors in research can arise from various sources, including investigators, instruments, and subjects, making the validation and reliability of research tools crucial for ensuring the credibility of findings. Subgroup analyses can either be planned before or emerge after (post-hoc) treatment. The interpretation of subgroup effects should consider the interaction between treatment effect and various patient variables with caution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104382
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importance of data collection and subgroup analyses in research methodology

Sunny Chi Lik Au
World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Importance of data collection and subgroup analyses in research methodology

Sunny Chi Lik Au
article en

Abstract

Data collection serves as the cornerstone in the study of clinical research questions. Two types of data are commonly utilized in medicine: (1) Qualitative; and (2) Quantitative. Several methods are commonly employed to gather data, regardless of whether retrospective or prospective studies are used: (1) Interviews; (2) Observational methods; (3) Questionnaires; (4) Investigation parameters; (5) Medical records; and (6) Electronic chart reviews. Each source type has its own advantages and cons in terms of the accuracy and availability of the data to be extracted. We will focus on the important parts of the research methodology: (1) Data collection; and (2) Subgroup analyses. Errors in research can arise from various sources, including investigators, instruments, and subjects, making the validation and reliability of research tools crucial for ensuring the credibility of findings. Subgroup analyses can either be planned before or emerge after (post-hoc) treatment. The interpretation of subgroup effects should consider the interaction between treatment effect and various patient variables with caution.

World Journal of Meta-AnalysisVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Importance of data collection and subgroup analyses in research methodology — Sunny Chi Lik Au · World Journal of Meta-Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS