Enhancing digital mental health platforms: a usability exploration with ergonomics design students

Purpose This study aims to explore how specific usability attributes influence engagement, perceived therapeutic efficacy and help-seeking behaviour within a prototype digital mental health platform. Design/methodology/approach Fifty-five undergraduate ergonomics and product design students performed ten scenario-based tasks on a high-fidelity Web prototype (AMGR-0). Screen recordings generated completion-time metrics, and post-task questionnaires and think-aloud interviews provided qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics; thematic analysis of transcripts followed Braun and Clarke, informed by Nielsen’s heuristics and the Technology Acceptance Model. Findings Intuitive navigation, multilingual menus and hybrid care options (self-help and therapist contact) predicted shorter task time and higher satisfaction. Flexible session lengths (approximately 60 min) and rapid access to professional directories reduced self-reported barriers to help-seeking. Four themes emerged: navigational clarity, cognitive load, perceived usefulness and cultural-linguistic alignment. Participants overwhelmingly preferred hybrid, mobile-and-Web delivery (78%) and combined therapist-assisted/self-help care (58%). Research limitations/implications Results are derived from a homogeneous, design-literate student sample and a single-session interaction with a prototype; generalisability and long-term engagement effects remain to be tested. Practical implications Stakeholders should minimise click-depth, support multilingual interfaces and offer configurable hybrid pathways to sustain user engagement and lower help-seeking barriers. Social implications By reducing cognitive and cultural friction, usable platforms can widen access to mental health support among digitally connected but underserved populations. Originality/value This study links fine-grained usability metrics to perceived efficacy and help-seeking intentions, providing actionable, theory-grounded guidelines for the next generation of culturally adaptive digital mental health interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Digital Technologies
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mhdt-01-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing digital mental health platforms: a usability exploration with ergonomics design students

Isabel Seguí Verdú, Larisa Dunai, Harold Ngabo-Woods
Mental Health and Digital Technologies
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Enhancing digital mental health platforms: a usability exploration with ergonomics design students

Isabel Seguí Verdú, Larisa Dunai, Harold Ngabo-Woods
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore how specific usability attributes influence engagement, perceived therapeutic efficacy and help-seeking behaviour within a prototype digital mental health platform. Design/methodology/approach Fifty-five undergraduate ergonomics and product design students performed ten scenario-based tasks on a high-fidelity Web prototype (AMGR-0). Screen recordings generated completion-time metrics, and post-task questionnaires and think-aloud interviews provided qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics; thematic analysis of transcripts followed Braun and Clarke, informed by Nielsen’s heuristics and the Technology Acceptance Model. Findings Intuitive navigation, multilingual menus and hybrid care options (self-help and therapist contact) predicted shorter task time and higher satisfaction. Flexible session lengths (approximately 60 min) and rapid access to professional directories reduced self-reported barriers to help-seeking. Four themes emerged: navigational clarity, cognitive load, perceived usefulness and cultural-linguistic alignment. Participants overwhelmingly preferred hybrid, mobile-and-Web delivery (78%) and combined therapist-assisted/self-help care (58%). Research limitations/implications Results are derived from a homogeneous, design-literate student sample and a single-session interaction with a prototype; generalisability and long-term engagement effects remain to be tested. Practical implications Stakeholders should minimise click-depth, support multilingual interfaces and offer configurable hybrid pathways to sustain user engagement and lower help-seeking barriers. Social implications By reducing cognitive and cultural friction, usable platforms can widen access to mental health support among digitally connected but underserved populations. Originality/value This study links fine-grained usability metrics to perceived efficacy and help-seeking intentions, providing actionable, theory-grounded guidelines for the next generation of culturally adaptive digital mental health interventions.

Mental Health and Digital TechnologiesVol. 2(3)
Universitat Politècnica de València (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.