Challenging Misconceptions: Unpacking the Concept of Self-Managed Organizations

Purpose: This study aims to identify and critically analyze the most common misconceptions surrounding self-managed organizations (SMOs), shedding light on how they affect management practices and the successful implementation of SMO models.The objective is to clarify the essence of SMOs and provide practical insights for organizational leaders.Design/Methodology/Approach: The research adopts a qualitative approach, employing a multi-source data collection strategy.The analysis includes a comprehensive review of academic and industry literature, case studies, and digital content such as websites, blogs, podcasts, and reports.Additionally, data were collected from academic assessments, student discussions, and events organized by the Teal Breakfast Poland Foundation, contributing an understanding of how SMOs are perceived in both theoretical and practical contexts. Findings:The study reveals a range of prevalent misconceptions about SMOs in both scholarly literature and business practice.The findings highlight the need for more nuanced research and better dissemination of accurate knowledge about SMOs, emphasizing their potential when properly understood.Practical Implications: Misinterpretations of the SMO model can lead to failed implementations and unmet expectations, particularly when organizations adopt selfmanagement without a clear understanding of its core principles.Originality/Value: This article makes a significant contribution to the field by addressing the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical applications of SMOs.It clarifies common myths, thereby providing a robust foundation for both academic and managerial audiences.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3997
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenging Misconceptions: Unpacking the Concept of Self-Managed Organizations

Aneta Pisarska, Davide, Filomena Buonocore
EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Challenging Misconceptions: Unpacking the Concept of Self-Managed Organizations

Aneta Pisarska, Davide, Filomena Buonocore
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify and critically analyze the most common misconceptions surrounding self-managed organizations (SMOs), shedding light on how they affect management practices and the successful implementation of SMO models.The objective is to clarify the essence of SMOs and provide practical insights for organizational leaders.Design/Methodology/Approach: The research adopts a qualitative approach, employing a multi-source data collection strategy.The analysis includes a comprehensive review of academic and industry literature, case studies, and digital content such as websites, blogs, podcasts, and reports.Additionally, data were collected from academic assessments, student discussions, and events organized by the Teal Breakfast Poland Foundation, contributing an understanding of how SMOs are perceived in both theoretical and practical contexts. Findings:The study reveals a range of prevalent misconceptions about SMOs in both scholarly literature and business practice.The findings highlight the need for more nuanced research and better dissemination of accurate knowledge about SMOs, emphasizing their potential when properly understood.Practical Implications: Misinterpretations of the SMO model can lead to failed implementations and unmet expectations, particularly when organizations adopt selfmanagement without a clear understanding of its core principles.Originality/Value: This article makes a significant contribution to the field by addressing the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical applications of SMOs.It clarifies common myths, thereby providing a robust foundation for both academic and managerial audiences.

EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNALVol. XXVIII(Issue 2)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.