The quantitative and qualitative allocation of ministerial portfolios to European radical right parties

This paper examines the ministerial portfolio allocation to European Radical Right Parties (RRPs) in coalition governments, focusing on both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Ministerial portfolio allocation, essential for policy implementation and government stability, typically follows the proportionality principle, aligning ministerial portfolios with seat share. Meanwhile, traditional mainstream parties often secure ministerial portfolios that match their electoral programs. This study investigates whether RRPs—long regarded as “pariah parties”, despite their increasing participation in coalition governments since the early twenty-first century, often entering as weak junior partners and maintaining a hostile stance toward liberal democracy—follow these allocation patterns. Our analysis shows that while RRPs exhibit a proportional seat-to-portfolio share relationship, their allocations are more strongly influenced by bargaining power. Moreover, RRPs often fail to obtain ministerial portfolios aligned with their electoral priorities. Thus, while RRPs appear normalized in terms of quantitative allocation, they continue to face significant qualitative challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1500403
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The quantitative and qualitative allocation of ministerial portfolios to European radical right parties

Tian Yuan Tan
1 citations
Frontiers in Political Science
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
article

The quantitative and qualitative allocation of ministerial portfolios to European radical right parties

Tian Yuan Tan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the ministerial portfolio allocation to European Radical Right Parties (RRPs) in coalition governments, focusing on both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Ministerial portfolio allocation, essential for policy implementation and government stability, typically follows the proportionality principle, aligning ministerial portfolios with seat share. Meanwhile, traditional mainstream parties often secure ministerial portfolios that match their electoral programs. This study investigates whether RRPs—long regarded as “pariah parties”, despite their increasing participation in coalition governments since the early twenty-first century, often entering as weak junior partners and maintaining a hostile stance toward liberal democracy—follow these allocation patterns. Our analysis shows that while RRPs exhibit a proportional seat-to-portfolio share relationship, their allocations are more strongly influenced by bargaining power. Moreover, RRPs often fail to obtain ministerial portfolios aligned with their electoral priorities. Thus, while RRPs appear normalized in terms of quantitative allocation, they continue to face significant qualitative challenges.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
Tohoku University (JP)
Chuo University, Seikei University, Tohoku University, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The quantitative and qualitative allocation of ministerial portfolios to European radical right parties — Tian Yuan Tan · Frontiers in Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS