Alzheimer’s disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review

As digital biomarkers gain traction in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, understanding recent advancements is crucial. This review conducts a bibliometric analysis of 431 studies from five online databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL, and provides a scoping review of 86 artificial intelligence (AI) models. Research in this field is supported by 224 grants across 54 disciplines and 1403 institutions in 44 countries, with 2571 contributing researchers. Key focuses include motor activity, neurocognitive tests, eye tracking, and speech analysis. Classical machine learning models dominate AI research, though many lack performance reporting. Of 21 AD-focused models, the average AUC is 0.887, while 45 models for mild cognitive impairment show an average AUC of 0.821. Notably, only 2 studies incorporated external validation, and 3 studies performed model calibration. This review highlights the progress and challenges of integrating digital biomarkers into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01640-z
Citations
27
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alzheimer’s disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review

Xiaohong Zhu, Jiaqi Li, Heming Fu, Shihua Cao et al.
27 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
39.72
article

Alzheimer’s disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review

Xiaohong Zhu, Jiaqi Li, Heming Fu, Shihua Cao, Zhenyu Yan, Bin Wang, Junling Kang, Guoliang Xing, Lizzy Boots, Chaoqun Dong, Yongze Dong, Kun Zhang, Pan Li, Yunfan He, Mengjiao Zhao, Hongkai Chen, Shen Yao, Xiaodong Lü, Guowei Jiang, Shiying Shen, Huajuan Shen, Yankai Shi, Wenhao Qi
article en
27 citations

Abstract

As digital biomarkers gain traction in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, understanding recent advancements is crucial. This review conducts a bibliometric analysis of 431 studies from five online databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, IEEE Xplore, and CINAHL, and provides a scoping review of 86 artificial intelligence (AI) models. Research in this field is supported by 224 grants across 54 disciplines and 1403 institutions in 44 countries, with 2571 contributing researchers. Key focuses include motor activity, neurocognitive tests, eye tracking, and speech analysis. Classical machine learning models dominate AI research, though many lack performance reporting. Of 21 AD-focused models, the average AUC is 0.887, while 45 models for mild cognitive impairment show an average AUC of 0.821. Notably, only 2 studies incorporated external validation, and 3 studies performed model calibration. This review highlights the progress and challenges of integrating digital biomarkers into clinical practice.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 8(1)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Fujian Medical University (CN), Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Fudan University (CN), Maastricht University (NL), Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Stony Brook University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
39.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.