Glorifications and Simplifications in Case Studies of Danish WWII Nonviolent Resistance

Danish resistance to Nazi occupation during WWII is frequently used in literature on civil resistance as an example of how nonviolent resistance has been improvised. Considering the newest historical research, this study has analyzed six English-language texts about Danish resistance written with the explicit purpose of investigating it as nonviolent resistance. Although some of the texts are relatively accurate, others include mistakes and myths, and there is a tendency to glorify the Danes. The majority of the texts are found to simplify a complex reality, especially when it comes to the interactions between sabotage and nonviolence, as well as internal Danish differences. The craving to tell the story of the good Danes against the evil Nazis apparently makes it difficult for the authors to find room for the contradictions, internal power struggles, and less flattering aspects of the resistance. These findings are problematic for the applied field of civil resistance, which aspires to provide research that can be useful for present and future struggles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Resistance Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.054
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glorifications and Simplifications in Case Studies of Danish WWII Nonviolent Resistance

Majken Jul Sørensen
2 citations
Journal of Resistance Studies
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
4.20
article

Glorifications and Simplifications in Case Studies of Danish WWII Nonviolent Resistance

Majken Jul Sørensen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Danish resistance to Nazi occupation during WWII is frequently used in literature on civil resistance as an example of how nonviolent resistance has been improvised. Considering the newest historical research, this study has analyzed six English-language texts about Danish resistance written with the explicit purpose of investigating it as nonviolent resistance. Although some of the texts are relatively accurate, others include mistakes and myths, and there is a tendency to glorify the Danes. The majority of the texts are found to simplify a complex reality, especially when it comes to the interactions between sabotage and nonviolence, as well as internal Danish differences. The craving to tell the story of the good Danes against the evil Nazis apparently makes it difficult for the authors to find room for the contradictions, internal power struggles, and less flattering aspects of the resistance. These findings are problematic for the applied field of civil resistance, which aspires to provide research that can be useful for present and future struggles.

Journal of Resistance StudiesVol. 3(1)
University of Wollongong (AU), Karlstad University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.