“A Comparative Assessment of Port Fuel Injection and Direct Injection of Hydrogen in Internal Combustion Engines: Performance, Efficiency, and Emissions”

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">With the transition toward low-carbon fuel-based transportation systems, hydrogen is becoming increasingly promising as a sustainable internal combustion engine (ICE) fuel. There are two pathways for introducing hydrogen: Port Fuel Injection (PFI) and Direct Injection (DI) in an engine, which greatly affect performance, efficiency, and emissions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">In the Port Fuel Injection (PFI), hydrogen is introduced into the intake manifold and mixed with air before reaching the combustion chamber. This approach is preferred due to its affordability, ease of use, and compatibility with current engine configurations. Because of PFI's more uniform air-fuel mixture, combustion is smoother, and NOx emissions are reduced. On the other hand, it raises the possibility of pre-ignition, particularly when engine loads are high, and a decrease in volumetric efficiency due to a reduction in the volume of intake air as hydrogen replaces it.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Direct injection gives exact control over the timing and volume of fuel injected by delivering hydrogen straight into the combustion chamber. This method increases power output, thermal management, and combustion efficiency. Injecting hydrogen closer to the top dead center (TDC) decreases premature ignition. DI also lowers the danger of pre-ignition and knock. Despite these benefits, DI systems are more expensive and complicated, requiring precise control mechanisms and cutting-edge injector technology. The study examines through comparative assessment of the two introduction mechanisms for a country like India and suggests that although DI is better suited for high-performance engines, providing greater efficiency and power, with extra complexity, PFI is favorable for cost-sensitive applications where simplicity and emission reduction are prioritized.</div></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-0239
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“A Comparative Assessment of Port Fuel Injection and Direct Injection of Hydrogen in Internal Combustion Engines: Performance, Efficiency, and Emissions”

Sukh Das Ahirwar, Naveen Kumar
SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

“A Comparative Assessment of Port Fuel Injection and Direct Injection of Hydrogen in Internal Combustion Engines: Performance, Efficiency, and Emissions”

Sukh Das Ahirwar, Naveen Kumar
article en

Abstract

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">With the transition toward low-carbon fuel-based transportation systems, hydrogen is becoming increasingly promising as a sustainable internal combustion engine (ICE) fuel. There are two pathways for introducing hydrogen: Port Fuel Injection (PFI) and Direct Injection (DI) in an engine, which greatly affect performance, efficiency, and emissions.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">In the Port Fuel Injection (PFI), hydrogen is introduced into the intake manifold and mixed with air before reaching the combustion chamber. This approach is preferred due to its affordability, ease of use, and compatibility with current engine configurations. Because of PFI's more uniform air-fuel mixture, combustion is smoother, and NOx emissions are reduced. On the other hand, it raises the possibility of pre-ignition, particularly when engine loads are high, and a decrease in volumetric efficiency due to a reduction in the volume of intake air as hydrogen replaces it.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph">Direct injection gives exact control over the timing and volume of fuel injected by delivering hydrogen straight into the combustion chamber. This method increases power output, thermal management, and combustion efficiency. Injecting hydrogen closer to the top dead center (TDC) decreases premature ignition. DI also lowers the danger of pre-ignition and knock. Despite these benefits, DI systems are more expensive and complicated, requiring precise control mechanisms and cutting-edge injector technology. The study examines through comparative assessment of the two introduction mechanisms for a country like India and suggests that although DI is better suited for high-performance engines, providing greater efficiency and power, with extra complexity, PFI is favorable for cost-sensitive applications where simplicity and emission reduction are prioritized.</div></div>

SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesVol. 1
Delhi Technological University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.