Proximal humeral endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumour defects
MUTARS proximal humerus reconstruction outcomes are satisfying, particularly in terms of mechanical failure. RSA and hemiarthroplasty exhibit comparable revision risks, with previous surgery at same site as a prognostic factor for revision due to dislocation. RSA appears to provide the best functional outcome.
Authors
- Marta Fiocco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5588-0277)
- Edwin F. Dierselhuis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7340-225X)
- Ioannis G. Trikoupis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4759-4814)
- Michiel A. J. van de Sande (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-7656)
- Richard E. Evenhuis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-7096)
- Sebastian G. Walter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-8616)
- Simen Sellevold
- Michaël P. A. Bus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0023-6016)
- Maurizio Scorianz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-065X)
- Jorge Cabrolier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-9804)
Institutions
- Leiden University (NL)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
- Princess Máxima Center (NL)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bone & Joint Open
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.66.bjo-2025-0018
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.02