A Comparative Study of Education as Soft Power: The Cases of China and the United States

Education is increasingly used as a diplomatic tool to project soft power globally. This study explores how China and the United States employ education to shape their international image and influence. The study aims to compare educational strategies used by both nations, analyze their effectiveness, and assess international students' perceptions. The target population includes international students currently enrolled in Chinese and U.S. universities. A purposive sample of 20 international students (10 from each country) was selected. Convenience sampling was also used for expert interviews. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis, including policy papers and institutional reports. A qualitative comparative case study design was employed, grounded in Nye’s soft power theory and constructivist international relations theory. Interviews were transcribed and coded thematically. Cross-case analysis was conducted to identify similarities and contrasts. Both nations use scholarships and cultural promotion, but the U.S. emphasizes prestige, while China focuses on accessibility and regional ties. Recommendations: Both countries should ensure academic freedom and intercultural engagement to enhance the credibility and sustainability of their soft power strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal of Psychology
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/rjs.v3i2.155
Primary Topic
Global Education and Multiculturalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Education as Soft Power: The Cases of China and the United States

Muhammad Ashfaq
Research Journal of Psychology
Global Education and Multiculturalism
article

A Comparative Study of Education as Soft Power: The Cases of China and the United States

Muhammad Ashfaq
article en

Abstract

Education is increasingly used as a diplomatic tool to project soft power globally. This study explores how China and the United States employ education to shape their international image and influence. The study aims to compare educational strategies used by both nations, analyze their effectiveness, and assess international students' perceptions. The target population includes international students currently enrolled in Chinese and U.S. universities. A purposive sample of 20 international students (10 from each country) was selected. Convenience sampling was also used for expert interviews. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis, including policy papers and institutional reports. A qualitative comparative case study design was employed, grounded in Nye’s soft power theory and constructivist international relations theory. Interviews were transcribed and coded thematically. Cross-case analysis was conducted to identify similarities and contrasts. Both nations use scholarships and cultural promotion, but the U.S. emphasizes prestige, while China focuses on accessibility and regional ties. Recommendations: Both countries should ensure academic freedom and intercultural engagement to enhance the credibility and sustainability of their soft power strategies.

Research Journal of PsychologyVol. 3(2)
Fatima Jinnah Women University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Global Education and Multiculturalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.