The Chinese Strategy of Cooperation With Central and Eastern Europe: Temporary Difficulties or the Prospect of Imminent Collapse?

In 2012 China and sixteen countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) established at the summit in Warsaw the new cooperation framework known as ‘16 +1’ Platform, ‘16+1’ Framework or ‘16+1’ Format which in 2022 celebrated its tenth anniversary (The sixteen member nations of the ‘16+1 Initiative’ are: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia). The aim of this article is to assess this paradigm of cooperation in terms of the goals and implemented strategies, considering international and regional conditions. The declared key goals of the Platform included: expanding China’s cooperation with CEE countries to increase investment and trade to improve the development of the CEE region and strengthen mutual economic ties. With time, the platform was largely seen as a ‘gateway to Europe’ for its flagship foreign policy initiative, the Belt and Road (BRI). In 2019, after the acceptance of Greece’s application (H. Ciurtin, The ‘16+1’ Becomes the ‘17+1’: Greece Joins China’s Dwindling Cooperation Framework in CEE, http://lt.china-office.gov.cn/eng/en/201807/ t20180731_2676625.htm), the number of countries participating in the platform expanded to seventeen. However, in the following period different crises appeared. This included the first Lithuanian withdrawal (May 2021) from cooperation and then Estonian and Latvian (August 2022). The platform, which was once called the 17 + 1, now has fourteen members plus China. Overtime, the key problem of the Chinese strategy was it failed to resolve structural deficiencies ensuring its institutional survival. Combined with the consequences of the COVID19 pandemic and first the recognition of the primacy of the competences of the European Commission in coordinating cooperation with China by the participating EU Member States, ultimately ended the prospects for the cooperation paradigm that was adopted in 2012. While based on IR-theory, the main aim of this article is to provide an overview of the development as well as the current state of affairs of the cooperation between China and the CEE countries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Foreign Affairs Review
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2025013
Primary Topic
Economic Issues in Ukraine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Chinese Strategy of Cooperation With Central and Eastern Europe: Temporary Difficulties or the Prospect of Imminent Collapse?

Stephen Nagy, Stanisław Czesław Kozłowski
European Foreign Affairs Review
Economic Issues in Ukraine
article

The Chinese Strategy of Cooperation With Central and Eastern Europe: Temporary Difficulties or the Prospect of Imminent Collapse?

Stephen Nagy, Stanisław Czesław Kozłowski
article en

Abstract

In 2012 China and sixteen countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) established at the summit in Warsaw the new cooperation framework known as ‘16 +1’ Platform, ‘16+1’ Framework or ‘16+1’ Format which in 2022 celebrated its tenth anniversary (The sixteen member nations of the ‘16+1 Initiative’ are: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia). The aim of this article is to assess this paradigm of cooperation in terms of the goals and implemented strategies, considering international and regional conditions. The declared key goals of the Platform included: expanding China’s cooperation with CEE countries to increase investment and trade to improve the development of the CEE region and strengthen mutual economic ties. With time, the platform was largely seen as a ‘gateway to Europe’ for its flagship foreign policy initiative, the Belt and Road (BRI). In 2019, after the acceptance of Greece’s application (H. Ciurtin, The ‘16+1’ Becomes the ‘17+1’: Greece Joins China’s Dwindling Cooperation Framework in CEE, http://lt.china-office.gov.cn/eng/en/201807/ t20180731_2676625.htm), the number of countries participating in the platform expanded to seventeen. However, in the following period different crises appeared. This included the first Lithuanian withdrawal (May 2021) from cooperation and then Estonian and Latvian (August 2022). The platform, which was once called the 17 + 1, now has fourteen members plus China. Overtime, the key problem of the Chinese strategy was it failed to resolve structural deficiencies ensuring its institutional survival. Combined with the consequences of the COVID19 pandemic and first the recognition of the primacy of the competences of the European Commission in coordinating cooperation with China by the participating EU Member States, ultimately ended the prospects for the cooperation paradigm that was adopted in 2012. While based on IR-theory, the main aim of this article is to provide an overview of the development as well as the current state of affairs of the cooperation between China and the CEE countries.

European Foreign Affairs ReviewVol. 30(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Economic Issues in Ukraine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.