A Bibliometric Analysis of Similarity Attraction Biasin Recruitment: Implications for Workplace Diversityand Inclusion

The effect of similarity attraction bias on hiring procedures and workplace diversity is examined in this paper. It looks at how cognitive biases, such favoring people who are similar to oneself, affect hiring practices and maintain inequalities in diversity in businesses. The study summarizes important ideas, such as gender, race, and organizational culture, by combining theoretical understandings and actual data from a thorough literature review. The research landscape is mapped using a bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer, which highlights important keywords and thematic clusters pertaining to diversity, bias, and recruiting. The study highlights significant patterns and relationships in the literature, keeping the focus on the psychological, organizational, and demographic elements which affect diversity results. This paper emphasizes topics for further study and theoretical developments. Simultaneously, it offers useful insights based on both theoretical and data-driven viewpoints to organizations looking to improve their diversity and inclusion efforts.

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Comparative Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2025.1.122
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Bibliometric Analysis of Similarity Attraction Biasin Recruitment: Implications for Workplace Diversityand Inclusion

Review of International Comparative Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

A Bibliometric Analysis of Similarity Attraction Biasin Recruitment: Implications for Workplace Diversityand Inclusion

article en

Abstract

The effect of similarity attraction bias on hiring procedures and workplace diversity is examined in this paper. It looks at how cognitive biases, such favoring people who are similar to oneself, affect hiring practices and maintain inequalities in diversity in businesses. The study summarizes important ideas, such as gender, race, and organizational culture, by combining theoretical understandings and actual data from a thorough literature review. The research landscape is mapped using a bibliometric analysis with VOSviewer, which highlights important keywords and thematic clusters pertaining to diversity, bias, and recruiting. The study highlights significant patterns and relationships in the literature, keeping the focus on the psychological, organizational, and demographic elements which affect diversity results. This paper emphasizes topics for further study and theoretical developments. Simultaneously, it offers useful insights based on both theoretical and data-driven viewpoints to organizations looking to improve their diversity and inclusion efforts.

Review of International Comparative Management(Vol. 26 No. 1 / 2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Similarity Attraction Biasin Recruitment: Implications for Workplace Diversityand Inclusion · Review of International Comparative Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS