Comparative Approach to Organizational Communicationin Conventional and Islamic Banking Systems

This paper conducts a comparative analysis of organizational communication strategies within conventional and Islamic banking systems, focusing on how these strategies influence operational efficiency, compliance, and stakeholder engagement within their distinct ethical and regulatory frameworks. Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, the study draws on secondary data from academic journals, industry reports, and specific case studies to explore the nuances of each system. The findings reveal that while conventional banks prioritize efficiency and profit maximization often facilitated by advanced technologies, Islamic banks emphasize ethical practices and transparency, guided by Sharia principles. These differences not only affect internal operations but also shape customer relationships and market perceptions. The paper concludes that integrating Islamic banking's ethical communication strategies into conventional banking could enhance global trust and compliance. This study suggests potential areas for further research, including the practical integration of these communication strategies across diverse banking environments, to foster a more inclusive and ethical global financial landscape.

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Comparative Management
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2025.1.5
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Approach to Organizational Communicationin Conventional and Islamic Banking Systems

Review of International Comparative Management
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Comparative Approach to Organizational Communicationin Conventional and Islamic Banking Systems

article en

Abstract

This paper conducts a comparative analysis of organizational communication strategies within conventional and Islamic banking systems, focusing on how these strategies influence operational efficiency, compliance, and stakeholder engagement within their distinct ethical and regulatory frameworks. Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, the study draws on secondary data from academic journals, industry reports, and specific case studies to explore the nuances of each system. The findings reveal that while conventional banks prioritize efficiency and profit maximization often facilitated by advanced technologies, Islamic banks emphasize ethical practices and transparency, guided by Sharia principles. These differences not only affect internal operations but also shape customer relationships and market perceptions. The paper concludes that integrating Islamic banking's ethical communication strategies into conventional banking could enhance global trust and compliance. This study suggests potential areas for further research, including the practical integration of these communication strategies across diverse banking environments, to foster a more inclusive and ethical global financial landscape.

Review of International Comparative Management(Vol. 26 No. 1 / 2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Approach to Organizational Communicationin Conventional and Islamic Banking Systems · Review of International Comparative Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS