Comparison of Preoperative Risk of Malignancy Index with Histopathological Findings in Patients with Ovarian Tumors

Background: Ovarian tumors are a significant health concern for women in Bangladesh, often presenting diagnostic challenges due to late-stage identification and limited access to specialized care. Implementing preoperative tools like the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) is critical in improving early detection and guiding clinical decision-making in resource-constrained settings. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the preoperative RMI and histopathological findings in patients with ovarian tumors. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study, conducted from September 2022 to August 2023 at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), included 102 female patients with ovarian tumors scheduled for surgery. Preoperative assessments involved ultrasound scoring, menopausal status determination, and serum CA-125 measurement, used to calculate the RMI. Histopathological examination served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Data were analyzed using SPSS- 26, with Fisher's Exact Test and RMI calculations performed. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. A p-value of <0.002 was considered statistically significant. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A substantial proportion, specifically 40.2%, of these patients were classified as high-risk preoperatively based on their RMI scores, with 45.1% demonstrating elevated CA-125 levels exceeding 100 IU/ ml. Notably, the analysis revealed a statistically significant association (p=0.002) between the type of ovarian tumor and a documented family history of ovarian or breast cancer. Conclusion: The findings highlight that a significant proportion of patients, often within a younger age group, presented with advanced disease, emphasizing the importance of early detection strategies. The statistically significant association between tumor type and family history underscores the need for thorough familial risk assessment. While RMI can serve as a valuable tool.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgery and Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26502/jsr.10020451
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Preoperative Risk of Malignancy Index with Histopathological Findings in Patients with Ovarian Tumors

Tanzina Iveen Chowdhury, Durjoy Majumder, Bidisha Chakma, Jinat Fatema et al.
Journal of Surgery and Research
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Comparison of Preoperative Risk of Malignancy Index with Histopathological Findings in Patients with Ovarian Tumors

Tanzina Iveen Chowdhury, Durjoy Majumder, Bidisha Chakma, Jinat Fatema, Prosad Kumar Das, Farah Noor, Sabiha Islam, Shah Noor Sharmin
article en

Abstract

Background: Ovarian tumors are a significant health concern for women in Bangladesh, often presenting diagnostic challenges due to late-stage identification and limited access to specialized care. Implementing preoperative tools like the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) is critical in improving early detection and guiding clinical decision-making in resource-constrained settings. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the preoperative RMI and histopathological findings in patients with ovarian tumors. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based cross-sectional study, conducted from September 2022 to August 2023 at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), included 102 female patients with ovarian tumors scheduled for surgery. Preoperative assessments involved ultrasound scoring, menopausal status determination, and serum CA-125 measurement, used to calculate the RMI. Histopathological examination served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Data were analyzed using SPSS- 26, with Fisher's Exact Test and RMI calculations performed. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. A p-value of <0.002 was considered statistically significant. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: A substantial proportion, specifically 40.2%, of these patients were classified as high-risk preoperatively based on their RMI scores, with 45.1% demonstrating elevated CA-125 levels exceeding 100 IU/ ml. Notably, the analysis revealed a statistically significant association (p=0.002) between the type of ovarian tumor and a documented family history of ovarian or breast cancer. Conclusion: The findings highlight that a significant proportion of patients, often within a younger age group, presented with advanced disease, emphasizing the importance of early detection strategies. The statistically significant association between tumor type and family history underscores the need for thorough familial risk assessment. While RMI can serve as a valuable tool.

Journal of Surgery and ResearchVol. 8(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.