How can Multi-Agents AI Systems help Reduce Biasesin Trading Algorithms?

Algorithmic trading is now the most common form of trading in financial markets, and it has been estimated that it accounts for 60-75% of the total trading volume in major markets. However, algorithmic trading is still accompanied by cognitive and algorithmic biases such as overconfidence, confirmation bias, and anchoring effects that can result in suboptimal decisions and higher levels of risk. These biases are due to the excess reliance on certain kinds of data, historical overfitting, and the absence of mechanisms to adapt to changing market environments. We propose in this paper, the use of multi-agent AI systems (MAIS) to tackle these biases through collaboration, role differentiation, and learning. In this manner, MAIS design various agents that perform specific tasks, for instance, fundamental analysts, sentiment analysts, and technical analysts to ensure that the analysis is holistic yet without concentrating on a single kind of data. Thus, debate protocols and risk management teams ensure that the generation and evaluation of trading ideas are properly structured and that overconfidence and groupthink are avoided. Furthermore, there are market observer agents and reflective agents that provide online learning of model drift and offline learning of historical performance, respectively. Our architecture framework was tested in a simulated environment in which MAIS traded against human traders and rule-based algorithms using historical market data. The results showed that there were great quantitative improvements in the Sharpe ratios and drawdowns, which show that the system is good at improving riskadjusted returns and decreasing volatility. The last section of the paper contains a conclusion and the suggestions for future research.

Publication Details

Journal
Review of International Comparative Management
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2025.2.364
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can Multi-Agents AI Systems help Reduce Biasesin Trading Algorithms?

Review of International Comparative Management
Auction Theory and Applications
article

How can Multi-Agents AI Systems help Reduce Biasesin Trading Algorithms?

article en

Abstract

Algorithmic trading is now the most common form of trading in financial markets, and it has been estimated that it accounts for 60-75% of the total trading volume in major markets. However, algorithmic trading is still accompanied by cognitive and algorithmic biases such as overconfidence, confirmation bias, and anchoring effects that can result in suboptimal decisions and higher levels of risk. These biases are due to the excess reliance on certain kinds of data, historical overfitting, and the absence of mechanisms to adapt to changing market environments. We propose in this paper, the use of multi-agent AI systems (MAIS) to tackle these biases through collaboration, role differentiation, and learning. In this manner, MAIS design various agents that perform specific tasks, for instance, fundamental analysts, sentiment analysts, and technical analysts to ensure that the analysis is holistic yet without concentrating on a single kind of data. Thus, debate protocols and risk management teams ensure that the generation and evaluation of trading ideas are properly structured and that overconfidence and groupthink are avoided. Furthermore, there are market observer agents and reflective agents that provide online learning of model drift and offline learning of historical performance, respectively. Our architecture framework was tested in a simulated environment in which MAIS traded against human traders and rule-based algorithms using historical market data. The results showed that there were great quantitative improvements in the Sharpe ratios and drawdowns, which show that the system is good at improving riskadjusted returns and decreasing volatility. The last section of the paper contains a conclusion and the suggestions for future research.

Review of International Comparative Management(Vol. 26 No. 2 / 2025)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How can Multi-Agents AI Systems help Reduce Biasesin Trading Algorithms? · Review of International Comparative Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS