An Overview and Survey of US Food and Drug Administration–Registered Wound Imaging Devices Capable of Determining Percentage Area Reduction and/or Percentage Volume Reduction

More wound imaging devices measure PAR than PVR, and most utilize the perimeter alone or in conjunction with square surface area and/or oval or other shapes for area calculations. While variations in length or width (up to 5%), and area (up to 10%) may occur with the device calculations, these variations are less than is seen with ruler measurements. Several imaging devices incorporate methods to correct for skew, have sophisticated 3-dimensional modeling, and/or use reference markers to enhance overall accuracy and reliability, supporting their measurements as reliable indicators of wound trajectory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/24201
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Overview and Survey of US Food and Drug Administration–Registered Wound Imaging Devices Capable of Determining Percentage Area Reduction and/or Percentage Volume Reduction

Holly Korzendorfer, Francis V. James, Alisha Oropallo, Peggy Dotson et al.
WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice
Wound Healing and Treatments
article

An Overview and Survey of US Food and Drug Administration–Registered Wound Imaging Devices Capable of Determining Percentage Area Reduction and/or Percentage Volume Reduction

Holly Korzendorfer, Francis V. James, Alisha Oropallo, Peggy Dotson, W. H. Cole
article en

Abstract

More wound imaging devices measure PAR than PVR, and most utilize the perimeter alone or in conjunction with square surface area and/or oval or other shapes for area calculations. While variations in length or width (up to 5%), and area (up to 10%) may occur with the device calculations, these variations are less than is seen with ruler measurements. Several imaging devices incorporate methods to correct for skew, have sophisticated 3-dimensional modeling, and/or use reference markers to enhance overall accuracy and reliability, supporting their measurements as reliable indicators of wound trajectory.

WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and PracticeVol. 37(5)
Northwell Health (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US), Kent State University (US), Collaborative Research Group (AU), Marist University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Wound Healing and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Overview and Survey of US Food and Drug Administration–Registered Wound Imaging Devices Capable of Determining Percentage Area Reduction and/or Percentage Volume Reduction — Holly Korzendorfer, Francis V. James, et al. · WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS