AI and Criminal Liability: Theoretical Dilemmas in Applying Criminal Law to Artificial Intelligence

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) shows undetermined challenges for criminal law, particularly in determining liability for autonomous or semi-autonomous AI actions as traditional legal doctrines based on human intent (Mens Rea) and action (Actus Reus) are not sufficient when applied to Artificial intelligence which lacks consciousness or moral agency, this paper conducts analysis of these pre-existing elements and discusses international and domestic legal frameworks—focusing on Pakistan, the European Union, the United States, and others—to explore how AI-related criminal liability is perceived globally. The study show key gaps in legal areas, liability and enforcement mechanisms, it demonstrate that current legal systems must be reformed or expanded to address the complex legal status of AI for future regulatory development and legal areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/cxwpfa06
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and Criminal Liability: Theoretical Dilemmas in Applying Criminal Law to Artificial Intelligence

Danish Bashir Mangi, Tahseen Akhtar Memon, Ihsanullah Butro
˜The œcritical review of social sciences studies
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

AI and Criminal Liability: Theoretical Dilemmas in Applying Criminal Law to Artificial Intelligence

Danish Bashir Mangi, Tahseen Akhtar Memon, Ihsanullah Butro
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) shows undetermined challenges for criminal law, particularly in determining liability for autonomous or semi-autonomous AI actions as traditional legal doctrines based on human intent (Mens Rea) and action (Actus Reus) are not sufficient when applied to Artificial intelligence which lacks consciousness or moral agency, this paper conducts analysis of these pre-existing elements and discusses international and domestic legal frameworks—focusing on Pakistan, the European Union, the United States, and others—to explore how AI-related criminal liability is perceived globally. The study show key gaps in legal areas, liability and enforcement mechanisms, it demonstrate that current legal systems must be reformed or expanded to address the complex legal status of AI for future regulatory development and legal areas.

˜The œcritical review of social sciences studiesVol. 3(2)
University of Sindh (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.