Predicting animal movement metrics across the species range for landscape-scale applications

Abstract Background Understanding animal movement across broad ecological contexts is essential for guiding management decisions in natural resource and animal disease management. However, most movement studies collect data over small spatial extents, which challenges using the data for landscape-scale management applications. Methods We collated relocation data from 564 wild pigs spanning 25 studies across 10 states in the United States. We derived net and daily displacement distributions for individuals in each of 4 seasons. We fit gamma distributions to displacement distributions and derived mean and dispersion parameters as metrics of displacement magnitude and variation. We modeled mean and dispersion variables using gradient-boosted regression, including landscape and weather predictors, and predicted daily and net displacement distributions across the species range. We used integrated step selection analysis to estimate habitat selection for wild pig groups sharing a common composition of habitat availability across the studied populations. Results Female average ( ± 95% confidence interval) net displacement means varied by season, peaking in Jul-Sept at 1,152 ± 140 m along with daily displacement mean distances of 650 ± 41 m. Average net displacement means for males peaked in Oct.-Dec. at 1,651 ± 160 m with daily displacement mean distances of 1,092 ± 95 m. Extreme net displacement values ranged up to 9,649 m and 4,080 m for male and female, respectively, and extreme daily displacement distribution means of 6,616 m for males, and 3,855 m for females. Almost half of the individuals included a similar composition of habitat availability, regardless of study site location. Herbaceous wetland was the most consistently favored land type and was available for more than 70% of all individual pigs across all studies. Preference for other land types depended strongly on habitat availability. Conclusions By comparing movement and habitat selection across a large geographic extent, our work provides new insights about the environmental drivers and limits of wild pig movement behavior. Our workflow digests variation wild pig movement distributions and habitat selection into parameters that can be used to predict movement on heterogeneous landscapes for downstream applications such as invasive species elimination campaigns or disease management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Ecology
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-026-00707-0
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Predicting animal movement metrics across the species range for landscape-scale applications

Kayleigh Chalkowski, Kim M. Pepin, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Raoul Keith Boughton et al.
Movement Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Predicting animal movement metrics across the species range for landscape-scale applications

Kayleigh Chalkowski, Kim M. Pepin, Stephen S. Ditchkoff, Raoul Keith Boughton, Mitchell A. Parsons, George Wittemyer, Stephen L. Webb, Kurt C. VerCauteren
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding animal movement across broad ecological contexts is essential for guiding management decisions in natural resource and animal disease management. However, most movement studies collect data over small spatial extents, which challenges using the data for landscape-scale management applications. Methods We collated relocation data from 564 wild pigs spanning 25 studies across 10 states in the United States. We derived net and daily displacement distributions for individuals in each of 4 seasons. We fit gamma distributions to displacement distributions and derived mean and dispersion parameters as metrics of displacement magnitude and variation. We modeled mean and dispersion variables using gradient-boosted regression, including landscape and weather predictors, and predicted daily and net displacement distributions across the species range. We used integrated step selection analysis to estimate habitat selection for wild pig groups sharing a common composition of habitat availability across the studied populations. Results Female average ( ± 95% confidence interval) net displacement means varied by season, peaking in Jul-Sept at 1,152 ± 140 m along with daily displacement mean distances of 650 ± 41 m. Average net displacement means for males peaked in Oct.-Dec. at 1,651 ± 160 m with daily displacement mean distances of 1,092 ± 95 m. Extreme net displacement values ranged up to 9,649 m and 4,080 m for male and female, respectively, and extreme daily displacement distribution means of 6,616 m for males, and 3,855 m for females. Almost half of the individuals included a similar composition of habitat availability, regardless of study site location. Herbaceous wetland was the most consistently favored land type and was available for more than 70% of all individual pigs across all studies. Preference for other land types depended strongly on habitat availability. Conclusions By comparing movement and habitat selection across a large geographic extent, our work provides new insights about the environmental drivers and limits of wild pig movement behavior. Our workflow digests variation wild pig movement distributions and habitat selection into parameters that can be used to predict movement on heterogeneous landscapes for downstream applications such as invasive species elimination campaigns or disease management.

Movement Ecology
Utah State University (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), Carter Center (US), United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Florida (US), Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health (US), National Wildlife Research Center (US), Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (US), Arizona State University (US), Auburn University (US), Michigan State University (US), Texas A&M University (US), Colorado State University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Life on land
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon