Risk of injury prediction during landing from 33 cm height: Kinetic approach for sports application

Objectives: Jump-landing assessments measure an individual’s ability to absorb ground reaction forces, generate explosive lower limb power, and maintain joint alignment, all of which are critical to understanding sports injury risk. Footwear significantly affects jumping mechanics and injury potential, leading to increased interest in activities done barefoot. This study investigates kinetic responses and injury risks when landing from a height of 33 cm, comparing conditions with and without sports shoes. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five healthy young adults were volunteers for this study. Kinetic parameters were recorded and processed using Quattro Jump force plat and Mars Quarter performance analysis software. Data were summarised into mean ± standard deviation values and statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences-26. Results: The without and with shoe jumping data show scattered parameters, with maximum forces of 4450.84 N and 3892.60 N at 33 cm, indicating a 62.45% and 54.6% risk of metatarsal injury, respectively. The stabilisation force was 623.96 N and 632.20 N at 33 cm, reached at 0.58 s and 0.63 s, respectively. Time from max force to max force before stabilisation regression analysis indicated a low R-squared value and a random fit plot. Conclusion: In the barefoot condition, initial contact force and max force were 28.57% (120 N) and 13.38% (4,450.84 N) higher, respectively, compared to the shoe condition (90 N and 3,892.60 N). However, the stabilisation force was higher with shoes (632.20 N) than barefoot (623.96 N). This suggests a higher risk of musculoskeletal injuries and joint stress when barefoot due to the higher forces while wearing shoes enhances balance and stability through increased stabilisation force.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_467_2024
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of injury prediction during landing from 33 cm height: Kinetic approach for sports application

Madhusudan Pal, Nitin Bhanot, Sugata Das Kumar, Karan Singh et al.
Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Risk of injury prediction during landing from 33 cm height: Kinetic approach for sports application

Madhusudan Pal, Nitin Bhanot, Sugata Das Kumar, Karan Singh, Rajib Jana, Ayan Maity
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Jump-landing assessments measure an individual’s ability to absorb ground reaction forces, generate explosive lower limb power, and maintain joint alignment, all of which are critical to understanding sports injury risk. Footwear significantly affects jumping mechanics and injury potential, leading to increased interest in activities done barefoot. This study investigates kinetic responses and injury risks when landing from a height of 33 cm, comparing conditions with and without sports shoes. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five healthy young adults were volunteers for this study. Kinetic parameters were recorded and processed using Quattro Jump force plat and Mars Quarter performance analysis software. Data were summarised into mean ± standard deviation values and statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences-26. Results: The without and with shoe jumping data show scattered parameters, with maximum forces of 4450.84 N and 3892.60 N at 33 cm, indicating a 62.45% and 54.6% risk of metatarsal injury, respectively. The stabilisation force was 623.96 N and 632.20 N at 33 cm, reached at 0.58 s and 0.63 s, respectively. Time from max force to max force before stabilisation regression analysis indicated a low R-squared value and a random fit plot. Conclusion: In the barefoot condition, initial contact force and max force were 28.57% (120 N) and 13.38% (4,450.84 N) higher, respectively, compared to the shoe condition (90 N and 3,892.60 N). However, the stabilisation force was higher with shoes (632.20 N) than barefoot (623.96 N). This suggests a higher risk of musculoskeletal injuries and joint stress when barefoot due to the higher forces while wearing shoes enhances balance and stability through increased stabilisation force.

Indian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyVol. 69
University of Calcutta (IN), DAV University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.