Optimizing Access to Justice Through the Prodeo and Sidang Keliling in Boroko Religious Court

This study evaluates the effectiveness of implementing the Prodeo and Sidang Keliling at the Boroko Religious Court in PERMA No. 1 of 2014. The research method used is qualitative with a juridical-empirical approach, including data collection through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results showed that implementing the two programs significantly increased access to justice for the underprivileged. However, fluctuations were found in the realization of annual cases, highlighting the need for budget adjustments and more effective socialization strategies. The discussion emphasized the importance of adapting legal services to the needs of local communities and integrating the provider approach into the broader justice system. The conclusion of this study suggests that with improved management and socialization, the Prodeo and Sidang keliling can continue to effectively support the principles of social justice and broader access to legal services. The implications of this study lead to policy recommendations to optimize resource allocation and socialization strategies in the Indonesian judicial system, especially in the Boroko Religious Court.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Mujtahid Journal of Islamic Family Law
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30984/ajifl.v4i2.3341
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Access to Justice Through the Prodeo and Sidang Keliling in Boroko Religious Court

Hasyim Sofyan Lahilote, Rizaldy Purnomo Pedju, Ahmad Rajafi, Irawati Mustafa
Al-Mujtahid Journal of Islamic Family Law
Legal Studies and Policies
article

Optimizing Access to Justice Through the Prodeo and Sidang Keliling in Boroko Religious Court

Hasyim Sofyan Lahilote, Rizaldy Purnomo Pedju, Ahmad Rajafi, Irawati Mustafa
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of implementing the Prodeo and Sidang Keliling at the Boroko Religious Court in PERMA No. 1 of 2014. The research method used is qualitative with a juridical-empirical approach, including data collection through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis. The results showed that implementing the two programs significantly increased access to justice for the underprivileged. However, fluctuations were found in the realization of annual cases, highlighting the need for budget adjustments and more effective socialization strategies. The discussion emphasized the importance of adapting legal services to the needs of local communities and integrating the provider approach into the broader justice system. The conclusion of this study suggests that with improved management and socialization, the Prodeo and Sidang keliling can continue to effectively support the principles of social justice and broader access to legal services. The implications of this study lead to policy recommendations to optimize resource allocation and socialization strategies in the Indonesian judicial system, especially in the Boroko Religious Court.

Al-Mujtahid Journal of Islamic Family LawVol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.