Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala

The study, Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala, examines the effectiveness of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiative in addressing educational challenges in low-performing public schools. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through self-developed instruments, including the Scale for Evaluation of School Performance (SESP) and a checklist for physical facilities, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and qualitative interviews with parents. Quantitative findings revealed that privatized-public schools performed better in assessments, parent-teacher interaction, and co-curricular activities, enhancing students’ development and parents’ engagement. However, these schools lagged in teacher qualifications compared to low-performing public schools, which excelled in this area but struggled with inadequate infrastructure and resources. Gender parity among teaching staff was observed in both school types, with a higher proportion of female teachers. Qualitative data highlighted that parent of privatized-public school students appreciated financial relief, improved facilities, and increased stakeholder interaction, while parents of students in low-performing public schools expressed concerns about limited teacher engagement and poor communication regarding their children's progress. The findings underscore the strengths and weaknesses of both school types, emphasizing the need for targeted improvements in teacher training, infrastructure development, and community involvement. The study concludes that while PPP programs have made strides in enhancing assessment systems and stakeholder engagement, both privatized-public and low-performing public schools require strategic interventions to elevate overall educational quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional lens.
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62997/rl.2024.31052
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala

Saira Saira, Muhammad Mudasar Ghafoor, Mishal Siyab
Regional lens.
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala

Saira Saira, Muhammad Mudasar Ghafoor, Mishal Siyab
article en

Abstract

The study, Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala, examines the effectiveness of the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiative in addressing educational challenges in low-performing public schools. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected through self-developed instruments, including the Scale for Evaluation of School Performance (SESP) and a checklist for physical facilities, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and qualitative interviews with parents. Quantitative findings revealed that privatized-public schools performed better in assessments, parent-teacher interaction, and co-curricular activities, enhancing students’ development and parents’ engagement. However, these schools lagged in teacher qualifications compared to low-performing public schools, which excelled in this area but struggled with inadequate infrastructure and resources. Gender parity among teaching staff was observed in both school types, with a higher proportion of female teachers. Qualitative data highlighted that parent of privatized-public school students appreciated financial relief, improved facilities, and increased stakeholder interaction, while parents of students in low-performing public schools expressed concerns about limited teacher engagement and poor communication regarding their children's progress. The findings underscore the strengths and weaknesses of both school types, emphasizing the need for targeted improvements in teacher training, infrastructure development, and community involvement. The study concludes that while PPP programs have made strides in enhancing assessment systems and stakeholder engagement, both privatized-public and low-performing public schools require strategic interventions to elevate overall educational quality.

Regional lens.Vol. 3(1)
University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Educational Quality in Privatized-Public Schools Under the Public-Private Partnership Program and Low-Performing Public Schools in District Gujranwala — Saira Saira, Muhammad Mudasar Ghafoor, et al. · Regional lens. (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS