Iranian Twitter Users' Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis of Tweets Regarding ChatGPT

In recent years, artificial intelligence has had a significant impact on the digital realm. This study aims to conduct an exploratory and qualitative analysis by examining user-generated opinions on Twitter regarding ChatGPT to understand the public perception of artificial intelligence. To achieve this, posts and comments from Twitter were reviewed. The study encompasses at least one hundred opinions that were carefully evaluated and selected to represent a diverse range of user perspectives. These opinions were analyzed in an exploratory and unrestricted manner to uncover the various aspects of public perception surrounding artificial intelligence. In this study, we took an exploratory approach to collect data from posts and comments of Iranian users on Twitter. Among the nearly a thousand posts and comments we collected in the first phase, we identified nearly 100 posts and comments that exemplify 18 themes in our data. By categorizing these themes, we could name two main categories that portray Iranian public perceptions of AI, especially Chatgpt. The first one is positive, which consists of opportunities, capacities, and capabilities themes, and the second one is challenges, concerns, and limitations of AI and ChatGPT. The first wing has themes such as "Humanistic communications of AI," "Artificial intelligence and problem-solving," "No bias in discussion with chatgpt," "AI and Productivity," "AI and daily work routines," "AI as a writing assistant," "Artificial intelligence human emotions," "Artificial intelligence as a teacher" and "Helping jobs to reduce errors." The second wing, Negative: Challenges, Concerns, and Limitations is comprised of "Unknown Future Challenges Using AI," "Hyped AI," "Monetization and Monopolization of Artificial Intelligence," "Cheating Artificial Intelligence," "Privacy Violation by AI," "Invalid and Unreliable Information," "Unintelligent and Untrained Intelligence," "Ideological Surveillance," and "Substitution for Human Labor."

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2025.5.3.4426
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iranian Twitter Users' Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis of Tweets Regarding ChatGPT

Seyed Faramarz Ranjbar, Fatemeh Shahrizfar
1 citations
International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
article

Iranian Twitter Users' Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis of Tweets Regarding ChatGPT

Seyed Faramarz Ranjbar, Fatemeh Shahrizfar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence has had a significant impact on the digital realm. This study aims to conduct an exploratory and qualitative analysis by examining user-generated opinions on Twitter regarding ChatGPT to understand the public perception of artificial intelligence. To achieve this, posts and comments from Twitter were reviewed. The study encompasses at least one hundred opinions that were carefully evaluated and selected to represent a diverse range of user perspectives. These opinions were analyzed in an exploratory and unrestricted manner to uncover the various aspects of public perception surrounding artificial intelligence. In this study, we took an exploratory approach to collect data from posts and comments of Iranian users on Twitter. Among the nearly a thousand posts and comments we collected in the first phase, we identified nearly 100 posts and comments that exemplify 18 themes in our data. By categorizing these themes, we could name two main categories that portray Iranian public perceptions of AI, especially Chatgpt. The first one is positive, which consists of opportunities, capacities, and capabilities themes, and the second one is challenges, concerns, and limitations of AI and ChatGPT. The first wing has themes such as "Humanistic communications of AI," "Artificial intelligence and problem-solving," "No bias in discussion with chatgpt," "AI and Productivity," "AI and daily work routines," "AI as a writing assistant," "Artificial intelligence human emotions," "Artificial intelligence as a teacher" and "Helping jobs to reduce errors." The second wing, Negative: Challenges, Concerns, and Limitations is comprised of "Unknown Future Challenges Using AI," "Hyped AI," "Monetization and Monopolization of Artificial Intelligence," "Cheating Artificial Intelligence," "Privacy Violation by AI," "Invalid and Unreliable Information," "Unintelligent and Untrained Intelligence," "Ideological Surveillance," and "Substitution for Human Labor."

International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesVol. 5(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
AI in Service Interactions
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Iranian Twitter Users' Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis of Tweets Regarding ChatGPT — Seyed Faramarz Ranjbar, Fatemeh Shahrizfar · International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS