DETERMINATION OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (SOA) AND MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE (MSA) USAGE CRITERIA

In modern software development, one of the key tasks is to choose the appropriate architecture for the system in the early stages of its design. This article examines two popular software architecture approaches: service-oriented architecture (SOA) and microservice architecture (MSA). Based on the analysis of architectural features, advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, the criteria that influence the choice of an architectural model depending on the specifics of the system are investigated. Microservice architecture, due to its independence and the possibility of rapid scaling, is better suited for dynamic systems with high requirements for flexibility. Service-oriented architecture, on the contrary, is focused on centralized management of services through ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) and provides better opportunities for integration and reuse of components in large corporate systems that do not require frequent changes in functionality. The main focus of the article is the development of an evaluation method that will allow software developers and system engineers to determine at the early design stages which of the architectures, SOA or MSA, is more appropriate to use for a specific system. Taking into account various technical and requirements, the method identifies key criteria that should be paid attention to when choosing an application software architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Science and Cybersecurity
Published
2024-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26565/2519-2310-2024-2-04
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DETERMINATION OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (SOA) AND MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE (MSA) USAGE CRITERIA

Oleh Siedashev
1 citations
Computer Science and Cybersecurity
Software System Performance and Reliability
0.35
article

DETERMINATION OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (SOA) AND MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE (MSA) USAGE CRITERIA

Oleh Siedashev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In modern software development, one of the key tasks is to choose the appropriate architecture for the system in the early stages of its design. This article examines two popular software architecture approaches: service-oriented architecture (SOA) and microservice architecture (MSA). Based on the analysis of architectural features, advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, the criteria that influence the choice of an architectural model depending on the specifics of the system are investigated. Microservice architecture, due to its independence and the possibility of rapid scaling, is better suited for dynamic systems with high requirements for flexibility. Service-oriented architecture, on the contrary, is focused on centralized management of services through ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) and provides better opportunities for integration and reuse of components in large corporate systems that do not require frequent changes in functionality. The main focus of the article is the development of an evaluation method that will allow software developers and system engineers to determine at the early design stages which of the architectures, SOA or MSA, is more appropriate to use for a specific system. Taking into account various technical and requirements, the method identifies key criteria that should be paid attention to when choosing an application software architecture.

Computer Science and Cybersecurity(2)
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Software System Performance and Reliability
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.