Reproductive Rights by The American Convention

This article critically examines two significant cases within the Inter-American Human Rights System (IAHRS): Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica and Manuela v. El Salvador. The Artavia Murillo case addresses the prohibition of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Costa Rica and its implications for reproductive autonomy and gender equality. Meanwhile, the Manuela case highlights the criminalization of obstetric emergencies in El Salvador and its disproportionate impact on vulnerable women. Through an analysis of these cases, the article explores how the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACmHR) have addressed issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, and systemic discrimination. The discussion further investigates the role of the principle of incremental protection of life under Article 4.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights. It concludes by identifying key contributions and limitations in the IAHRS jurisprudence regarding the intersection of human rights and reproductive justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36647/ttassh/05.02.a004
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive Rights by The American Convention

Ana Luiza Gregorio Vidotti
Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Reproductive Rights by The American Convention

Ana Luiza Gregorio Vidotti
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines two significant cases within the Inter-American Human Rights System (IAHRS): Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica and Manuela v. El Salvador. The Artavia Murillo case addresses the prohibition of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Costa Rica and its implications for reproductive autonomy and gender equality. Meanwhile, the Manuela case highlights the criminalization of obstetric emergencies in El Salvador and its disproportionate impact on vulnerable women. Through an analysis of these cases, the article explores how the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACmHR) have addressed issues of reproductive rights, gender-based violence, and systemic discrimination. The discussion further investigates the role of the principle of incremental protection of life under Article 4.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights. It concludes by identifying key contributions and limitations in the IAHRS jurisprudence regarding the intersection of human rights and reproductive justice.

Technoarete Transactions on Advances in Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 5(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.