Evolution of U.S. Regime Change Strategies during the Cold War

This article examines the evolution of US regime change strategies from the end of World War II to the present day. The research analyzes the transformation of American interventionist methods in the internal affairs of sovereign states, tracing the shift from direct CIA covert operations during the Cold War to contemporary "hybrid" forms of influence. The study is based on declassified CIA documents, National Security Council directives, Congressional materials, and extensive academic literature. The paper provides detailed analysis of specific cases of US intervention in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), and various Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African countries. Special attention is given to the institutionalization of regime change mechanisms through pseudo-civilian structures such as NED, USAID, which operate under the cover of "democracy promotion" and "civil society development." The scientific novelty lies in the systematic comparative analysis of different historical periods, revealing the continuity of American interventionist policy despite changing tactical approaches. The research demonstrates how classical CIA operations evolved into sophisticated "soft power" instruments while maintaining the same strategic objectives. The study also examines Soviet and Russian responses to US regime change strategies, including diplomatic countermeasures, support for allied governments, and development of alternative international structures. The main conclusion emphasizes that contemporary methods of forced "democratization" do not lead to sustainable development but instead cause regional destabilization and undermine international legal principles. The author argues for the restoration of genuine collective security systems based on respect for sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs of states.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Конфликтология / nota bene
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2025.3.74812
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of U.S. Regime Change Strategies during the Cold War

Bayram Arslanovich Arslanov, Egor Sergeevich Fartusov
1 links
Конфликтология / nota bene
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Evolution of U.S. Regime Change Strategies during the Cold War

Bayram Arslanovich Arslanov, Egor Sergeevich Fartusov
article en

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of US regime change strategies from the end of World War II to the present day. The research analyzes the transformation of American interventionist methods in the internal affairs of sovereign states, tracing the shift from direct CIA covert operations during the Cold War to contemporary "hybrid" forms of influence. The study is based on declassified CIA documents, National Security Council directives, Congressional materials, and extensive academic literature. The paper provides detailed analysis of specific cases of US intervention in Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Chile (1973), and various Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African countries. Special attention is given to the institutionalization of regime change mechanisms through pseudo-civilian structures such as NED, USAID, which operate under the cover of "democracy promotion" and "civil society development." The scientific novelty lies in the systematic comparative analysis of different historical periods, revealing the continuity of American interventionist policy despite changing tactical approaches. The research demonstrates how classical CIA operations evolved into sophisticated "soft power" instruments while maintaining the same strategic objectives. The study also examines Soviet and Russian responses to US regime change strategies, including diplomatic countermeasures, support for allied governments, and development of alternative international structures. The main conclusion emphasizes that contemporary methods of forced "democratization" do not lead to sustainable development but instead cause regional destabilization and undermine international legal principles. The author argues for the restoration of genuine collective security systems based on respect for sovereignty and non-interference in internal affairs of states.

Конфликтология / nota bene(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evolution of U.S. Regime Change Strategies during the Cold War — Bayram Arslanovich Arslanov, Egor Sergeevich Fartusov · Конфликтология / nota bene (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS