Enhancing Automated Essay Scoring with Grammatical Features using Multi-task Learning and Item Response Theory

In foreign language learning, writing tasks play a crucial role in developing and assessing learners’ language abilities, but manual scoring requires significant time and effort. Automated essay scoring (AES) is a way to mitigate this problem. Although human raters consider grammatical items and their difficulties as clues for judging learners’ proficiency levels while scoring essays, it is unclear whether the current state-of-the-art AES models, which use BERT-based essay representations, consider these factors. In this paper, we propose to incorporate grammatical features into BERT-based AES models in three ways: (1) using grammatical features as additional model inputs, (2) performing multi-task learning (MTL) with holistic and grammar scores while using grammatical features as model inputs, and (3) reconstructing grammatical features through MTL with holistic scores. For grammatical features, we model learners’ grammar usage using item response theory (IRT), which measures learners’ grammar abilities and characteristics of grammatical items, including their difficulties, based on essay data without teacher labels. The experimental results show that grammatical features improve the scoring performance, and further improvements are brought by MTL with holistic and grammar scores. We also show that weighting grammatical items using IRT-estimated difficulties improve the scoring performance, and IRT-estimated grammar abilities can be used for the labels of MTL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Natural Language Processing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5715/jnlp.32.438
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Automated Essay Scoring with Grammatical Features using Multi-task Learning and Item Response Theory

Satoshi Nakamura, Kosuke Doi, Katsuhito Sudoh, Taro Watanabe
1 citations
Journal of Natural Language Processing
Educational Technology and Assessment
3.25
article

Enhancing Automated Essay Scoring with Grammatical Features using Multi-task Learning and Item Response Theory

Satoshi Nakamura, Kosuke Doi, Katsuhito Sudoh, Taro Watanabe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In foreign language learning, writing tasks play a crucial role in developing and assessing learners’ language abilities, but manual scoring requires significant time and effort. Automated essay scoring (AES) is a way to mitigate this problem. Although human raters consider grammatical items and their difficulties as clues for judging learners’ proficiency levels while scoring essays, it is unclear whether the current state-of-the-art AES models, which use BERT-based essay representations, consider these factors. In this paper, we propose to incorporate grammatical features into BERT-based AES models in three ways: (1) using grammatical features as additional model inputs, (2) performing multi-task learning (MTL) with holistic and grammar scores while using grammatical features as model inputs, and (3) reconstructing grammatical features through MTL with holistic scores. For grammatical features, we model learners’ grammar usage using item response theory (IRT), which measures learners’ grammar abilities and characteristics of grammatical items, including their difficulties, based on essay data without teacher labels. The experimental results show that grammatical features improve the scoring performance, and further improvements are brought by MTL with holistic and grammar scores. We also show that weighting grammatical items using IRT-estimated difficulties improve the scoring performance, and IRT-estimated grammar abilities can be used for the labels of MTL.

Journal of Natural Language ProcessingVol. 32(2)
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN), Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP), Nara Women's University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Educational Technology and Assessment
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.