Support for the US Endangered Species Act Is High and Steady Over the Past Three Decades

ABSTRACT Conservation professionals expect increased attempts to weaken the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) during the second Trump administration. As such, it is important to understand Americans’ level of support for the ESA. Prior research indicates that support for the ESA remained consistently strong across four studies conducted over a two‐decade period, 1996–2015. The research presented here extends those observations to six studies conducted over a three‐decade period, 1996–2025. We find that support of the ESA over that period has remained consistently high, at about 84%, and opposition has remained consistently low, at about 12%. We also report on other trends and patterns in support for the ESA, highlighting high and growing support for the ESA among politically conservative people and the absence of any rural–urban divide in support for the ESA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Letters
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.13111
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Support for the US Endangered Species Act Is High and Steady Over the Past Three Decades

Jeremy T. Bruskotter, L. Mark Elbroch, Adam Feltz, Robyn S. Wilson et al.
2 citations
Conservation Letters
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
article

Support for the US Endangered Species Act Is High and Steady Over the Past Three Decades

Jeremy T. Bruskotter, L. Mark Elbroch, Adam Feltz, Robyn S. Wilson, Thomas Offer‐Westort
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Conservation professionals expect increased attempts to weaken the US Endangered Species Act (ESA) during the second Trump administration. As such, it is important to understand Americans’ level of support for the ESA. Prior research indicates that support for the ESA remained consistently strong across four studies conducted over a two‐decade period, 1996–2015. The research presented here extends those observations to six studies conducted over a three‐decade period, 1996–2025. We find that support of the ESA over that period has remained consistently high, at about 84%, and opposition has remained consistently low, at about 12%. We also report on other trends and patterns in support for the ESA, highlighting high and growing support for the ESA among politically conservative people and the absence of any rural–urban divide in support for the ESA.

Conservation LettersVol. 18(3)
Michigan Technological University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Support for the US Endangered Species Act Is High and Steady Over the Past Three Decades — Jeremy T. Bruskotter, L. Mark Elbroch, et al. · Conservation Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS