Space cybersecurity governance: assessing policies and frameworks in view of the future European space legislation

Abstract The space industry has grown significantly in recent years and has become essential to our daily lives. Space applications are now critical for powering necessary infrastructure, such as energy grids and financial networks. However, as the use and value of space continue to rise, it has also become a primary target for cyber threats, posing a significant risk to the networks and their connections with critical infrastructure. As a result, policymakers in Europe and other regions are developing policies, standards, and guidelines to improve space cybersecurity and protect this crucial sector. This paper aims to analyze the responsible entities for space cybersecurity governance in the UK, the USA, Germany, and the European Union and compare existing policies and guidelines against current threats. The goal is to determine the steps necessary to make the industry more robust. Our study focuses on European legislation, with a future Space Law on the horizon. The first policies to be part of our comparative analysis are the “Technical Guideline BSI TR-03184 Information Security for Space System” established in Germany, the UK Space Agency’s “Cyber Security Toolkit,” and NASA’s Space “Security: Best Practices Guide”. Our findings highlight how governance frameworks for space security have not yet been clearly defined and we foresee a significant increase in the fragmentation of policies. We emphasize the importance of defining resilience clearly and providing tools and metrics to help industries measure their security and evaluate risk levels, to comply with upcoming policies. To achieve this goal, we suggest mapping cybersecurity requirements to practical security controls and safeguards that companies can easily understand and implement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cybersecurity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyaf013
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Space exploration and regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Space cybersecurity governance: assessing policies and frameworks in view of the future European space legislation

Francesco Casaril, Letterio Galletta
4 citations
Journal of Cybersecurity
Space exploration and regulation
4.62
article

Space cybersecurity governance: assessing policies and frameworks in view of the future European space legislation

Francesco Casaril, Letterio Galletta
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The space industry has grown significantly in recent years and has become essential to our daily lives. Space applications are now critical for powering necessary infrastructure, such as energy grids and financial networks. However, as the use and value of space continue to rise, it has also become a primary target for cyber threats, posing a significant risk to the networks and their connections with critical infrastructure. As a result, policymakers in Europe and other regions are developing policies, standards, and guidelines to improve space cybersecurity and protect this crucial sector. This paper aims to analyze the responsible entities for space cybersecurity governance in the UK, the USA, Germany, and the European Union and compare existing policies and guidelines against current threats. The goal is to determine the steps necessary to make the industry more robust. Our study focuses on European legislation, with a future Space Law on the horizon. The first policies to be part of our comparative analysis are the “Technical Guideline BSI TR-03184 Information Security for Space System” established in Germany, the UK Space Agency’s “Cyber Security Toolkit,” and NASA’s Space “Security: Best Practices Guide”. Our findings highlight how governance frameworks for space security have not yet been clearly defined and we foresee a significant increase in the fragmentation of policies. We emphasize the importance of defining resilience clearly and providing tools and metrics to help industries measure their security and evaluate risk levels, to comply with upcoming policies. To achieve this goal, we suggest mapping cybersecurity requirements to practical security controls and safeguards that companies can easily understand and implement.

Journal of CybersecurityVol. 11(1)
IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Space exploration and regulation
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.