GHG Emissions and Carbon Footprint in Two Integrated Farming SystemModelsin Telangana State, India

Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon footprint has become an important objective in farming, besides profitability and sustainability.A study was carried out to compare two different integrated farming system(IFS) modelsin Telangana state, India for their GHG emissions and carbon footprint. Both the IFS models, i.e.,IFS1 with crop+horticulture+2dairy buffaloes+6 goats+50 backyard poultry birds, and IFS2 with crop+horti-pasture+2 indigenous cows+12 goats+160 backyard poultry birds on a 1 ha area were carbon negative and environmentally safe. A total of 2.792 and 2.148 kg nitrous oxide was emitted from the cropping unit of IFS1 and IFS2 respectively. Increasing the area under legumes in the cropping unit of IFS 2 reduced the GHG emissions by 12.9%. Increasing commercial and irrigated dry (ID) crops not only helped increase profitability but also kept the GHG emissions at low levels. Horti-pasture system contributed to the negative carbon footprint by reducing the emission of GHGs, and by increasing the carbon sink. From the livestock unit, due to enteric fermentation, 94 kg of methane emissions were recorded with the improved breed of buffaloes (IFS 1) and 56 kg with indigenous cows (IFS 2). Improvement in soil organic carbon was observed under all cropping systems with the application of 10 Mg ha -1 organic manures each year. Due to manure production, 23.7 and 19.07 kg of methane emissions along with 15.27 and 9.38 kg nitrous oxide emissions were observed over these two years in IFS1 and IFS2 respectively.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21276/aatccreview.2025.13.01.280
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GHG Emissions and Carbon Footprint in Two Integrated Farming SystemModelsin Telangana State, India

Md. Latheef Pasha, M. Goverdhan, G. Kiran Reddy, Sridevi Tallapragada et al.
Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

GHG Emissions and Carbon Footprint in Two Integrated Farming SystemModelsin Telangana State, India

Md. Latheef Pasha, M. Goverdhan, G. Kiran Reddy, Sridevi Tallapragada, M. Venkata Ramana, N. Ch. PragathiKumari
article en

Abstract

Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and carbon footprint has become an important objective in farming, besides profitability and sustainability.A study was carried out to compare two different integrated farming system(IFS) modelsin Telangana state, India for their GHG emissions and carbon footprint. Both the IFS models, i.e.,IFS1 with crop+horticulture+2dairy buffaloes+6 goats+50 backyard poultry birds, and IFS2 with crop+horti-pasture+2 indigenous cows+12 goats+160 backyard poultry birds on a 1 ha area were carbon negative and environmentally safe. A total of 2.792 and 2.148 kg nitrous oxide was emitted from the cropping unit of IFS1 and IFS2 respectively. Increasing the area under legumes in the cropping unit of IFS 2 reduced the GHG emissions by 12.9%. Increasing commercial and irrigated dry (ID) crops not only helped increase profitability but also kept the GHG emissions at low levels. Horti-pasture system contributed to the negative carbon footprint by reducing the emission of GHGs, and by increasing the carbon sink. From the livestock unit, due to enteric fermentation, 94 kg of methane emissions were recorded with the improved breed of buffaloes (IFS 1) and 56 kg with indigenous cows (IFS 2). Improvement in soil organic carbon was observed under all cropping systems with the application of 10 Mg ha -1 organic manures each year. Due to manure production, 23.7 and 19.07 kg of methane emissions along with 15.27 and 9.38 kg nitrous oxide emissions were observed over these two years in IFS1 and IFS2 respectively.

Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical ReviewsVol. 13(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

GHG Emissions and Carbon Footprint in Two Integrated Farming SystemModelsin Telangana State, India — Md. Latheef Pasha, M. Goverdhan, et al. · Agriculture Association of Textile Chemical and Critical Reviews (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS