Third-Party Funding and Securing the Defendant’s Claim for Reimbursement of Litigation Costs in German Civil Procedure Using English Law as an Example

Abstract This article explores the growing significance of third-party litigation funding in German civil procedure, with a particular focus on securing the defendant’s claim for reimbursement of litigation costs. While Germany has implemented protective measures against abusive litigation and conflicts of interest, there is limited protection ensuring defendants can recover costs if a third-party-funded plaintiff is unsuccessful. Drawing comparisons with English law, the article highlights the absence of cost security provisions for defendants in German law and advocates for reforms that would enable defendants to demand security for litigation costs from claimants and third-party funders. Such measures would align with the principles of procedural fairness, balancing the risks and incentives involved in third-party-funded cases. The proposed reforms aim to establish a fairer cost-allocation system that secures defendants’ rights while maintaining access to justice for claimants supported by third-party funders.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of procedural law.
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/30504856-15010006
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Third-Party Funding and Securing the Defendant’s Claim for Reimbursement of Litigation Costs in German Civil Procedure Using English Law as an Example

Marcus O. Müller
International journal of procedural law.
European and International Contract Law
article

Third-Party Funding and Securing the Defendant’s Claim for Reimbursement of Litigation Costs in German Civil Procedure Using English Law as an Example

Marcus O. Müller
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the growing significance of third-party litigation funding in German civil procedure, with a particular focus on securing the defendant’s claim for reimbursement of litigation costs. While Germany has implemented protective measures against abusive litigation and conflicts of interest, there is limited protection ensuring defendants can recover costs if a third-party-funded plaintiff is unsuccessful. Drawing comparisons with English law, the article highlights the absence of cost security provisions for defendants in German law and advocates for reforms that would enable defendants to demand security for litigation costs from claimants and third-party funders. Such measures would align with the principles of procedural fairness, balancing the risks and incentives involved in third-party-funded cases. The proposed reforms aim to establish a fairer cost-allocation system that secures defendants’ rights while maintaining access to justice for claimants supported by third-party funders.

International journal of procedural law.Vol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Third-Party Funding and Securing the Defendant’s Claim for Reimbursement of Litigation Costs in German Civil Procedure Using English Law as an Example — Marcus O. Müller · International journal of procedural law. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS