Boycotting Apartheid: Comparing US Labor’s Responses to the South African and Palestinian Freedom Movements

Abstract In the 1980s, organized labor in the United States enthusiastically threw its weight behind the Free South Africa Movement, with top union officials championing boycotts and divestments against Pretoria to nonviolently push for an end to the racist apartheid system. But twenty years later, many of these same labor officials came out in opposition to Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions ( bds ), a South African-inspired movement to similarly pressure the Israeli government to end its military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and to respect Palestinian human rights and self-determination. By juxtaposing US labor’s drastically different responses to the South African and Palestinian freedom movements, this essay highlights the ways that American unions choose to either embrace or reject calls for international solidarity and how, in the case of Palestine, the choice has been shaped by US labor officialdom’s traditional alliance with the State of Israel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Labor and Society
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10180
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boycotting Apartheid: Comparing US Labor’s Responses to the South African and Palestinian Freedom Movements

Jeff Schuhrke
1 citations
Journal of Labor and Society
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

Boycotting Apartheid: Comparing US Labor’s Responses to the South African and Palestinian Freedom Movements

Jeff Schuhrke
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the 1980s, organized labor in the United States enthusiastically threw its weight behind the Free South Africa Movement, with top union officials championing boycotts and divestments against Pretoria to nonviolently push for an end to the racist apartheid system. But twenty years later, many of these same labor officials came out in opposition to Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions ( bds ), a South African-inspired movement to similarly pressure the Israeli government to end its military occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and to respect Palestinian human rights and self-determination. By juxtaposing US labor’s drastically different responses to the South African and Palestinian freedom movements, this essay highlights the ways that American unions choose to either embrace or reject calls for international solidarity and how, in the case of Palestine, the choice has been shaped by US labor officialdom’s traditional alliance with the State of Israel.

Journal of Labor and SocietyVol. 28(2)
Empire State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Boycotting Apartheid: Comparing US Labor’s Responses to the South African and Palestinian Freedom Movements — Jeff Schuhrke · Journal of Labor and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS