Cost-effectiveness of the My Therapy self-directed therapy program for rehabilitation patients: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

ObjectiveTo determine if the My Therapy self-management program could be implemented without increasing the rehabilitation admission cost, from a health service perspective.DesignEconomic evaluation, including a cost-effectiveness analysis.SettingAustralian rehabilitation wards (<i>n</i> = 9).ParticipantsRehabilitation inpatients with any diagnosis.InterventionMy Therapy: a self-directed therapy program shown to increase daily inpatient rehabilitation participation dosage time by 38%.Main MeasuresOutcomes included cost (rehabilitation admission and all-cause 30-day readmissions), and effect (minimal clinically important difference in functional independence (FIM<sup>TM</sup>), and quality-adjusted life years (EQ-5D-5L)), to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsThere were 2363 participants, with a mean age of 77 (SD 13) years, 62% female, and 27% with cognitive impairment. My Therapy costs $5 (SD $2) per patient/day to implement, excluding opportunity costs. Estimated differences in effect were non-significant for the proportion of participants achieving a minimal clinically important difference in function (control 31%, intervention 36%; OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.53), and quality-adjusted life years (mean difference -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.02). Estimated differences in cost were also non-significant (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.16). ICERs were also non-significant. Post hoc, it was determined that the cost/minute of daily therapy participation was $14/minute for control and $11/minute for intervention conditions.ConclusionsThe My Therapy self-management program was implemented without increasing rehabilitation admission and all-cause 30-day readmission costs. However, clinical differences were not detected. There may have been a small reduction in cost/minute for daily therapy participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251347756
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of the My Therapy self-directed therapy program for rehabilitation patients: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

Lisa Somerville, Sara L. Whittaker, Keith Hill, Rania Abdelmotaleb et al.
1 citations
Clinical Rehabilitation
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
article

Cost-effectiveness of the My Therapy self-directed therapy program for rehabilitation patients: A stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

Lisa Somerville, Sara L. Whittaker, Keith Hill, Rania Abdelmotaleb, Meg E. Morris, Annemarie Louise Lee, Libby Callaway, Christina L. Ekegren, Nicholas F. Taylor, Natasha Anne Lannin, Natasha K. Brusco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine if the My Therapy self-management program could be implemented without increasing the rehabilitation admission cost, from a health service perspective.DesignEconomic evaluation, including a cost-effectiveness analysis.SettingAustralian rehabilitation wards (<i>n</i> = 9).ParticipantsRehabilitation inpatients with any diagnosis.InterventionMy Therapy: a self-directed therapy program shown to increase daily inpatient rehabilitation participation dosage time by 38%.Main MeasuresOutcomes included cost (rehabilitation admission and all-cause 30-day readmissions), and effect (minimal clinically important difference in functional independence (FIM<sup>TM</sup>), and quality-adjusted life years (EQ-5D-5L)), to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).ResultsThere were 2363 participants, with a mean age of 77 (SD 13) years, 62% female, and 27% with cognitive impairment. My Therapy costs $5 (SD $2) per patient/day to implement, excluding opportunity costs. Estimated differences in effect were non-significant for the proportion of participants achieving a minimal clinically important difference in function (control 31%, intervention 36%; OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.53), and quality-adjusted life years (mean difference -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.02). Estimated differences in cost were also non-significant (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.16). ICERs were also non-significant. Post hoc, it was determined that the cost/minute of daily therapy participation was $14/minute for control and $11/minute for intervention conditions.ConclusionsThe My Therapy self-management program was implemented without increasing rehabilitation admission and all-cause 30-day readmission costs. However, clinical differences were not detected. There may have been a small reduction in cost/minute for daily therapy participation.

Clinical RehabilitationVol. 39(7)
La Trobe University (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Frankston Hospital (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre (AU), Eastern Health (AU), Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre (AU), Center for Independent Living (US), Monash University (AU)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.