Coping with digitalization in diplomacy: autonomy and discretion at the digital frontlines

The advancement of digital technologies in the last decade has introduced new tools, workflows and stakeholders in diplomacy, creating significant information demands and a state of “digital stress.” To navigate these challenges, diplomats employ coping strategies that leverage their reflexivity and autonomy to manage demands, prioritize tasks, and mitigate overload. Beyond merely adapting traditional skills and engagement platforms to online settings, digital diplomacy has fostered new routines, norms, and practices, each accompanied by its own tensions and dilemmas. These challenges are addressed through discretionary decision-making and a relative independence from political authority, collectively shaping bureaucratic agency. This article examines digital stress in diplomacy by integrating insights from International Relations (IR) and international public administration scholarship. Drawing on fieldwork and interviews with European diplomats conducted between 2016 and 2024, it explores the coping strategies required for the evolving landscape of “digital diplomacy.” Engaging with Lipsky’s work on the coping mechanisms of frontline practitioners in the context of e-government, this study reveals how these coping strategies as sources of bureaucratic agency, push back against top-down digitalization efforts while also exposing risks and tensions in diplomatic norms and practices arising from digital transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of International Relations
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661251343006
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coping with digitalization in diplomacy: autonomy and discretion at the digital frontlines

Elsa Hedling
3 citations
European Journal of International Relations
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
11.59
article

Coping with digitalization in diplomacy: autonomy and discretion at the digital frontlines

Elsa Hedling
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The advancement of digital technologies in the last decade has introduced new tools, workflows and stakeholders in diplomacy, creating significant information demands and a state of “digital stress.” To navigate these challenges, diplomats employ coping strategies that leverage their reflexivity and autonomy to manage demands, prioritize tasks, and mitigate overload. Beyond merely adapting traditional skills and engagement platforms to online settings, digital diplomacy has fostered new routines, norms, and practices, each accompanied by its own tensions and dilemmas. These challenges are addressed through discretionary decision-making and a relative independence from political authority, collectively shaping bureaucratic agency. This article examines digital stress in diplomacy by integrating insights from International Relations (IR) and international public administration scholarship. Drawing on fieldwork and interviews with European diplomats conducted between 2016 and 2024, it explores the coping strategies required for the evolving landscape of “digital diplomacy.” Engaging with Lipsky’s work on the coping mechanisms of frontline practitioners in the context of e-government, this study reveals how these coping strategies as sources of bureaucratic agency, push back against top-down digitalization efforts while also exposing risks and tensions in diplomatic norms and practices arising from digital transformation.

European Journal of International Relations
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
11.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.